Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 16, 2021

Wentzel v. Pliler

Judge
Analisa Torres
Docket
1:21-cv-09245
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
HabeasPro SeCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Wentzel v. Pliler, Judge Swain ordered the pro se petitioner to pay the filing fee or submit an application to proceed without prepaying it.

Who this affects

Philip Hugh Wentzel, who was required to pay the filing fee or submit an application to proceed without prepaying fees to keep the action moving.

What happened

In Wentzel v. Pliler, Philip Hugh Wentzel filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus without paying the $5 filing fee or submitting an application to proceed without prepaying fees.

The court gave Wentzel 30 days to pay the fee or submit a signed application to proceed without prepaying it. The court said the case would be processed if he complied and would be dismissed if he did not. No response from the respondent was required at that time.

The court also denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees on any appeal from this order. Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain issued the order on November 16, 2021.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Wentzel v. Pliler · No. 1:21-cv-09245
Judge
Analisa Torres
Date
Nov. 16, 2021

Background

Philip Hugh Wentzel, representing himself, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The petition was submitted without the required $5 filing fee or a signed application asking to proceed without prepaying court fees. The opinion notes that Wentzel indicated in a cover letter that he had requested payment of the fee, but the court had not received it.

Order

The court directed Wentzel, within 30 days of the order, either to pay the $5 filing fee or complete and submit the attached application to proceed without prepaying fees. If the court grants the application, Wentzel may proceed without prepayment. The application must identify docket number 21-CV-9245 (LTS).

The court directed the Clerk of Court to mail the order to Wentzel and record service on the docket. No answer from the respondent was required at that time. The case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures if Wentzel complied; if he failed to comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed.

Appeal and disposition

The court certified that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for an appeal. Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the order. The opinion does not state that the action was dismissed at that time.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.