Figueroa v. ZZ Lashes Inc.
- Colleen McMahon
- 1:20-cv-04382
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Figueroa v. ZZ Lashes Inc., Judge McMahon received a request to stay the case or allow a non-joint pretrial filing; no ruling appears.
The parties to Figueroa v. ZZ Lashes Inc., particularly Defendant Oberoi, whose settlement signature and pretrial-order edits are discussed.
What happened
In Figueroa v. ZZ Lashes Inc., the plaintiff’s lawyer told the court that the parties had agreed to a settlement. A final agreement had been sent to Defendant Oberoi for signature.
The plaintiff asked the court to pause the case while the settlement was completed and then dismiss the case based on the settlement. Alternatively, the plaintiff asked for permission to file a proposed pretrial order without Oberoi’s edits, which had not been received after more than 40 days of follow-up.
The text is a request addressed to Judge Colleen McMahon, not a ruling. It does not state that Judge McMahon granted or denied either request.
The detailed version
- Figueroa v. ZZ Lashes Inc. · No. 1:20-cv-04382
- Colleen McMahon
- Nov. 17, 2021
Nature of the Filing
The text is a letter from the plaintiff’s counsel to Judge Colleen McMahon. It asks the court to stay, or pause, the action while the parties complete a settlement. It also makes an alternative request concerning the proposed pretrial order.
Settlement Request
Counsel states that the parties recently agreed to a settlement and that a final settlement agreement containing terms accepted by all parties was sent to Defendant Oberoi for execution, meaning signature. Counsel anticipated receiving the fully signed agreement and filing a stipulation to dismiss the action with prejudice within the next few months. The letter asks for a stay pending completion of the settlement and dismissal.
Alternative Pretrial-Order Request
Counsel also states that a draft proposed joint pretrial order was sent to Defendant Oberoi for edits more than 40 days earlier. According to the letter, counsel repeatedly followed up but had not received Oberoi’s edits. As an alternative to a stay, the plaintiff asks for permission to file the attached proposed pretrial order without joining Oberoi.
Disposition
The provided text does not contain a court order or state how Judge McMahon ruled on either request. It therefore does not show that the stay request or the alternative request was granted or denied.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.