Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Substantive rulingFiled Dec. 7, 2021

Byrd v. Saul

Judge
James Oetken
Docket
1:20-cv-04464
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Social SecurityCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Byrd v. Kijakazi, Judge Oetken adopted the recommendation, denied Byrd’s motion, granted the Commissioner’s motion, and closed the case.

Who this affects

Craig M. Byrd and the Commissioner of Social Security; the ruling left the administrative law judge’s determination against Byrd in place.

What happened

Craig M. Byrd v. Kilolo Kijakazi concerned Byrd’s challenge to an administrative law judge’s decision finding him ineligible for supplemental security income and disability insurance benefits. A magistrate judge recommended denying Byrd’s motion and granting the Commissioner’s motion.

Neither party objected to that recommendation. The district court therefore reviewed it for clear error and found none, including in the conclusion that the administrative law judge had considered the evidence and that the record supported the determination.

Judge J. Paul Oetken adopted the recommendation, denied Byrd’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, granted the Commissioner’s motion, directed entry of judgment, and closed the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Byrd v. Saul · No. 1:20-cv-04464
Judge
James Oetken
Date
Dec. 7, 2021

Background

Craig M. Byrd sought judicial review of an administrative law judge’s determination that he was ineligible for supplemental security income and disability insurance benefits. Byrd moved for judgment on the pleadings, and the Commissioner of Social Security cross-moved for judgment on the pleadings.

Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave recommended that Byrd’s motion be denied and that the Commissioner’s motion be granted. The recommendation stated that the administrative law judge had considered the totality of the evidence in determining Byrd’s residual functional capacity—the most he could still do despite his limitations—and that the record supported the administrative law judge’s determination.

Court’s Review

Neither party objected to the report and recommendation. Because no timely objection was filed, the district court reviewed the report for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake on the face of the record. The court found no such error and fully adopted the report.

Disposition

The court adopted the report and recommendation, denied Byrd’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, and granted the Commissioner’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. The Clerk of Court was directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the case. The order also directed substitution of Kilolo Kijakazi, the Acting Commissioner of Social Security, for Andrew Saul in the caption.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.