Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund v…
Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund v. Vrex Construction Inc.
- Jesse Furman
- 1:21-cv-09408
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 3
In Trustees v. Vrex Construction, Judge Furman confirmed the entire arbitration award and awarded interest, attorneys’ fees, and costs.
The petitioners obtained confirmation of the entire arbitration award, along with pre- and post-judgment interest and attorneys’ fees and costs. Vrex Construction Inc., the respondent, did not oppose the petition.
What happened
In Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund v. Vrex Construction Inc., the petitioners asked the court to confirm an arbitration award.
Vrex Construction did not respond to the petition or seek relief from the award. After reviewing the petition and supporting materials, the court found no genuine factual dispute preventing confirmation and found no legal basis under the Federal Arbitration Act to cancel the award.
Judge Jesse M. Furman confirmed the entire award and granted pre-judgment interest at 5.25 percent, post-judgment interest under federal law, and the petitioners’ requested attorneys’ fees and costs. He directed the petitioners to file a proposed judgment by January 10, 2022.
The detailed version
- Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund v… · No. 1:21-cv-09408
- Jesse Furman
- Jan. 3, 2022
Background
The petitioners filed a petition to confirm an arbitration award. The court set a briefing schedule, and the petitioners served Vrex Construction with the petition, supporting materials, and schedule. Vrex’s opposition was due December 14, 2021, but Vrex neither responded nor sought relief from the award.
Court’s Analysis
Because the petition was unopposed, the court treated it like a summary-judgment motion based on the petitioners’ submissions. Summary judgment is a decision entered when the materials show that no genuine dispute of important facts requires a trial. The court found no genuine issue of material fact concerning any part of the award. It also found that the arbitrator’s decision had more than a “barely colorable justification” and that no basis under Section 10(a) of the Federal Arbitration Act justified vacating the award.
Interest, Fees, and Costs
The court granted pre-judgment interest at 5.25 percent, the rate awarded by the arbitrator. It also awarded post-judgment interest under 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a). In addition, the court awarded the petitioners’ requested attorneys’ fees and costs, finding that they had shown the reasonableness and necessity of the time spent, rates charged, and litigation costs.
Ruling
Judge Jesse M. Furman granted the petitioners’ unopposed petition to confirm the entire arbitration award. The petitioners were directed to file a proposed judgment electronically by January 10, 2022.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.
Related cases
- 103 Centralv. Union
- Super Perfectv. Agroinvestbank Open
- Trustees for The Mason Tenders District Council Welfare Fund, Pension Fund…Apr 2023
- Drywall Tapers and Pointers of Greater New York Local Union 1974, Affiliated…Jan 2023
- Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund…Sep 2022
- Trustees of the Mason Tenders Distrcit Council Welfare Fund, Pension Fund…Jun 2022