Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 3, 2022

Zak v. Five Tier, Inc.

Judge
George Daniels
Docket
1:20-cv-09375
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
FlsaCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Zak v. Five Tier, Judge Daniels approved the parties’ settlement of a Fair Labor Standards Act case.

Who this affects

Daniel Zak, Five Tier, Inc., and Zak’s counsel; the order approved the settlement payments described in the opinion.

What happened

In Zak v. Five Tier, Inc., Daniel Zak and Five Tier, Inc. reached a settlement in a case under the Fair Labor Standards Act, a federal wage-and-hour law, and jointly asked the court to approve it.

The court reviewed the settlement agreement, motion, and attached exhibits under the review required by the Second Circuit’s decision in Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc.

Judge George B. Daniels granted the motion, approving a $15,150 payment to Zak, $5,000 in attorney fees and costs, and $650 in expenses for Zak’s counsel.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Zak v. Five Tier, Inc. · No. 1:20-cv-09375
Judge
George Daniels
Date
Jan. 3, 2022

Background

Daniel Zak sued Five Tier, Inc. in an action under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The opinion states that the parties reached a settlement and jointly moved for court approval.

Court’s analysis

The court reviewed the settlement terms, the joint motion, and the attached exhibits under the review required by Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., 796 F.3d 199 (2d Cir. 2015). The opinion does not describe the underlying wage-and-hour claims or explain the settlement’s terms beyond the payments it approved.

Ruling

The court granted the parties’ motion. It approved a settlement payment of $15,150 to Zak, payment of $5,000 in attorney fees and costs, and payment of $650 in expenses to Zak’s counsel.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.