Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 4, 2022

Nasiruddin v. United States

Judge
Cathy Seibel
Docket
7:21-cv-07044
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Nasiruddin v. United States, Judge Seibel allowed Nasiruddin to proceed without fees and ordered personal service, but denied fee-waiver status for an appeal.

Who this affects

Mujahid Nasiruddin, the federal prison officials listed for service, the Clerk of Court, and the United States Marshals Service; any appeal from this order would not receive fee-waiver status.

What happened

In Nasiruddin v. United States, Mujahid Nasiruddin, who was incarcerated, brought a case alleging that officials at the Federal Correctional Institution in Otisville used excessive force and denied him proper medical treatment. The opinion does not decide whether those allegations are true.

Nasiruddin had paid the filing fee but later asked to proceed without paying fees and asked the United States Marshals Service to serve the defendants because of his circumstances and difficulty arranging service.

Judge Seibel granted permission to proceed without fees, ordered the Marshals Service to serve the listed federal defendants in person, and extended the service deadline. The court denied permission to proceed without fees for an appeal from this order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Nasiruddin v. United States · No. 7:21-cv-07044
Judge
Cathy Seibel
Date
Jan. 4, 2022

Background

Mujahid Nasiruddin, who was incarcerated at the Federal Correctional Institution in Otisville, filed this case without a lawyer under 28 U.S.C. § 1331. He alleges that prison officials used excessive force against him and denied him proper medical treatment. The order addresses service of the lawsuit and fee status; it does not resolve those underlying allegations.

Nasiruddin had paid the filing fee, but he later applied for permission to proceed without paying fees and asked the United States Marshals Service to serve the defendants. He cited his circumstances, lack of financial resources, and difficulties arranging service.

Court’s rulings

The court granted Nasiruddin’s request to proceed without paying fees. It directed the Clerk of Court to prepare service forms, reissue the summonses, and provide the necessary papers to the Marshals Service. The Marshals Service was directed to serve the listed federal defendants in person at the Federal Correctional Institution in Otisville. The court also extended the time for service until 90 days after the summonses are reissued.

The order states that, if Nasiruddin does not complete service or request an extension within that period, the court may dismiss the claims under Rules 4 and 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to prosecute. It also requires him to notify the court in writing if his address changes.

Finally, the court certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without paying fees for purposes of an appeal. The order does not decide the excessive-force or medical-treatment claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.