Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 6, 2022

Shoy v. Harris

Judge
Vernon Broderick
Docket
1:22-cv-00084
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
HabeasCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Shoy v. Annucci, Judge Swain ordered Lorenzo Shoy to pay the filing fee or submit an application to proceed without prepayment.

Who this affects

Lorenzo Shoy, whose possible federal conviction-challenge petition could be dismissed if he did not pay the filing fee or submit the required application within 30 days.

What happened

In Lorenzo Shoy v. Anthony J. Annucci, the court treated Shoy’s affidavit as a possible petition challenging his 2017 Bronx County conviction. Shoy had not paid the filing fee or submitted an application to proceed without prepaying it.

The court gave Shoy 30 days to pay the $5 filing fee or submit a signed application for permission to proceed without prepayment. If he did not comply, the action would be dismissed. The court also said that no response from the defendant was required at that time.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered the Clerk of Court to mail the order to Shoy and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees, certifying that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Shoy v. Harris · No. 1:22-cv-00084
Judge
Vernon Broderick
Date
Jan. 6, 2022

Background

On January 4, 2022, the court received Lorenzo Shoy’s affidavit. The court stated that the affidavit appeared to be a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging Shoy’s 2017 Bronx County conviction. A person filing such a petition must either pay the $5 filing fee or submit a signed application to proceed in forma pauperis, meaning without prepaying court fees.

Shoy submitted neither the filing fee nor an application to proceed without prepayment. The order also stated that, if Shoy did not intend the affidavit to be his § 2254 petition, he could withdraw it.

Order

The court ordered Shoy, within 30 days of the order’s date, either to pay the $5 filing fee or complete and submit the attached application to proceed without prepayment. If he submitted the application, it had to include docket number 22-CV-0084 (LTS). The court explained that, if the application were granted, Shoy could proceed without prepaying fees.

The court stated that the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures if Shoy complied. If he failed to comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed. No answer from the defendant was required at that time. The Clerk was directed to mail Shoy a copy of the order and record service on the docket.

Appeal Certification

Judge Laura Taylor Swain certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. The court therefore denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.