Young v. Icebox, Inc.
- Vyskocil
- 1:21-cv-09346
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Young v. Icebox, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the action after settlement in principle, allowing restoration by February 24, 2022, otherwise with prejudice.
Lawrence Young, Icebox, Inc., and the other persons Young sought to represent in the action.
What happened
In Young v. Icebox, Inc., Lawrence Young told the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.
The court discontinued the action without costs to either party. It allowed either party to seek restoration of the action by February 24, 2022.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered that, if no restoration request was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice. The court would not retain jurisdiction to enforce any settlement agreement, and all other dates and deadlines were adjourned indefinitely.
The detailed version
- Young v. Icebox, Inc. · No. 1:21-cv-09346
- Vyskocil
- Jan. 10, 2022
Background
Lawrence Young notified the court by letter that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not describe the settlement’s terms or state whether the settlement had been finalized.
Order
The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar if an application to restore it was made by February 24, 2022. The court stated that if no such application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice. The court also stated that it would not retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of any settlement agreement. All other dates and deadlines were adjourned indefinitely.
Disposition
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil entered an order of dismissal based on the parties’ reported settlement in principle. The opinion does not decide the underlying claims.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.