Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 12, 2022

Jason v. Beslow

Judge
James Oetken
Docket
1:21-cv-09520
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

Judge Oetken transferred Jason v. Beslow to Virginia because venue was improper in New York.

Who this affects

Yassha Jason and the five named defendants; the case was moved from the Southern District of New York to the Eastern District of Virginia.

What happened

In Yassha Jason v. Vernon L. Beslow, III, Yassha Jason, who represented herself, alleged that the defendants violated federal constitutional and state-law rights. She filed the case in the Southern District of New York.

The court found that venue was improper there because the defendants were located in Virginia and the alleged events occurred in and around Spotsylvania County, Virginia. That county is in the Eastern District of Virginia.

Judge Oetken ordered the case transferred to the Eastern District of Virginia and closed the case in the Southern District of New York. He did not decide whether Jason’s claims were legally valid and denied permission to appeal without paying filing fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Jason v. Beslow · No. 1:21-cv-09520
Judge
James Oetken
Date
Jan. 12, 2022

Background

Yassha Jason, who was proceeding without a lawyer, sued Vernon L. Beslow, III; Judge Joseph Ellis; Judge Ricardo Rigual; Judge Georgia K. Sutton; and Acting Judge Valerie Jean Mayo. She asserted federal constitutional and state-law claims and invoked federal-question and diversity jurisdiction. Jason resides in Brooklyn, New York, and listed Virginia addresses for all defendants.

Venue analysis

Federal venue law generally permits a civil case to proceed in a district where all defendants reside, where a substantial part of the events occurred, or, in limited circumstances, where a defendant is subject to the court’s personal jurisdiction. The court found that Jason did not allege that any defendant resided in the Southern District of New York or that a substantial part of the relevant events occurred there. The opinion states that the claims arose in and around Spotsylvania County, Virginia, and that all defendants resided there or elsewhere within the Eastern District of Virginia.

Ruling and effect

The court ordered the Clerk to transfer the action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), a statute allowing transfer when venue is improper. The court closed the case in the Southern District of New York. It left the question of whether summonses should issue to the transferee court. The court also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying filing fees. The order did not resolve the merits of Jason’s claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.