Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 12, 2022

Lievano v. CoinTelegraph Media USA Inc.

Judge
Lorna Schofield
Docket
1:21-cv-03255
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Intellectual PropertyFee PetitionCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Lievano v. CoinTelegraph, Judge Schofield adopted in part and modified in part a damages recommendation, granting fees and costs totaling $12,097.

Who this affects

Peter Lievano received a total award of $12,097 from CoinTelegraph Media USA Inc., consisting of damages, attorney’s fees, and costs.

What happened

In Lievano v. CoinTelegraph Media USA Inc., the court had already entered a default judgment for Peter Lievano and sent the amount of damages and costs to a magistrate judge for review.

The magistrate judge recommended $2,000 in actual copyright damages, $5,000 in statutory damages under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, $5,097 in attorney’s fees, and $477 in costs. No timely objections were filed. The plaintiff’s fee request contained a typographical error, but his supporting declaration and billing records showed $4,620 in fees and $477 in costs.

Judge Lorna G. Schofield found no clear error in the damages recommendation, adopted the report in part, modified it in part, and granted the request for attorney’s fees and costs. The final award was $2,000 in actual damages, $5,000 in statutory damages, $4,620 in attorney’s fees, and $477 in costs, totaling $12,097. The court directed the Clerk to close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Lievano v. CoinTelegraph Media USA Inc. · No. 1:21-cv-03255
Judge
Lorna Schofield
Date
Jan. 12, 2022

Background

The court had previously entered a default judgment for Peter Lievano against CoinTelegraph Media USA Inc. A default judgment is a judgment entered when a defendant does not defend the case. The court referred the question of damages and costs to Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron for a post-judgment review.

Judge Aaron recommended an award of $2,000 in actual damages under the Copyright Act, $5,000 in statutory damages under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, $5,097 in attorney’s fees, and $477 in costs. The deadline for objections to the recommendation was fourteen days after service, and no timely objections were filed.

Attorney’s Fees and Costs

Peter Lievano separately moved for attorney’s fees and costs. The motion contained a typographical inconsistency: one part requested $4,620 in attorney’s fees and $477 in costs, while the concluding paragraph listed $5,097 in attorney’s fees and $477 in costs. The supporting declaration and billing records requested and supported $4,620 in fees and $477 in costs. The motion was unopposed.

The court found that the hours billed, hourly rates, and costs were reasonable. Because no timely objections were filed, the court reviewed the magistrate judge’s damages recommendation for clear error and found none.

Ruling

Judge Lorna G. Schofield ordered that the Report and Recommendation be adopted in part and modified in part, and granted Peter Lievano’s request for attorney’s fees and costs. The court awarded $2,000 in actual damages, $5,000 in statutory damages, $4,620 in attorney’s fees, and $477 in costs, for a total award of $12,097. The court also stated that post-judgment interest would apply under 28 U.S.C. § 1961 if the award became delinquent, and directed the Clerk of Court to close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.