Castro v. T&S Restaurant LLC
- Sarah Cave
- 1:21-cv-03136
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Castro v. T&S Restaurant LLC, Judge Cave approved the Fair Labor Standards Act settlement and dismissed the case with prejudice.
Pedro Castro, T&S Restaurant LLC, and Anastasio Katsaros; the settlement was approved and the case was closed, subject to the court’s retained authority to enforce the settlement agreement.
What happened
In Castro v. T&S Restaurant LLC, Pedro Castro and the defendants jointly asked the court to approve their settlement of this wage-and-hour case under the Fair Labor Standards Act.
The court considered the settlement agreement, including the payment schedule, attorney fees, and costs. It noted Castro’s serious concerns about whether the defendants could pay a judgment and found the settlement fair and reasonable under the circumstances.
Judge Sarah L. Cave approved the settlement, dismissed the action with prejudice and without costs except as provided in the agreement, and kept authority to enforce the agreement. The court also found any pending motions moot and directed the clerk to close the case.
The detailed version
- Castro v. T&S Restaurant LLC · No. 1:21-cv-03136
- Sarah Cave
- Jan. 14, 2022
Background
Pedro Castro brought this wage-and-hour case against T&S Restaurant LLC, doing business as Gracie’s Corner Diner, and Anastasio Katsaros. The parties consented to the jurisdiction of United States Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave for all purposes. They jointly submitted a letter and settlement agreement for court approval under the Fair Labor Standards Act and the Second Circuit’s requirements for reviewing such settlements.
Court’s analysis
The court stated that settlements in Fair Labor Standards Act cases generally receive a strong presumption of fairness because the parties are usually in a better position than the court to evaluate the settlement’s reasonableness. The court also considered Castro’s serious concerns about collectability based on the defendants’ poor financial position. It determined that the agreed payment schedule supported finding the settlement reasonable. After reviewing the parties’ submissions, the settlement agreement, and related exhibits, the court found all settlement terms—including the allocation of attorney fees and costs—fair and reasonable under the circumstances.
Ruling
The court approved the settlement. It dismissed the action with prejudice and without costs except as provided in the settlement agreement. The court retained jurisdiction to enforce the agreement, found any pending motions moot, directed the clerk to mark ECF No. 16 as granted, and directed the clerk to close the case.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.