Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 18, 2022

Garcia v. Thomas

Judge
George Daniels
Docket
1:21-cv-00636
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Section 1983Civil ProcedureDiscoveryPro Se
In one sentence

In Garcia v. Thomas, Judge Moses partly granted defendants’ request, ordering medical releases and warning that nonprosecution could lead to dismissal.

Who this affects

Daniel Garcia must provide the medical releases or arrange to obtain replacement copies by February 8, 2022, and was warned that failure to prosecute could lead to dismissal. The defendants received the discovery-related order.

What happened

In Garcia v. Thomas, Daniel Garcia brought a civil-rights case under federal law against correctional defendants, alleging failures to protect him and provide medical care after a suicide attempt, along with other claims. The opinion describes Garcia as representing himself.

The defendants asked the court to require Garcia to sign medical releases, warn him that the case could be dismissed for failing to pursue it, and require him to confirm that he intended to continue litigating. They said Garcia had not returned the releases or updated his address after his release from custody.

Judge Barbara C. Moses granted the application in part. She ordered Garcia to provide the executed medical releases by February 8, 2022, or contact defense counsel for replacement copies, and reminded him that failing to pursue the case could lead to dismissal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Garcia v. Thomas · No. 1:21-cv-00636
Judge
George Daniels
Date
Jan. 18, 2022

Background

Daniel Garcia filed this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The opinion states that Garcia alleged that, on December 27, 2020, he attempted to hang himself; that Officer Beethoven saw him with a string around his neck and did not help; that Correction Officer Thomas shoved his fist into Garcia’s back when Garcia could no longer breathe; and that Captain Guerra told him to “do it again” while escorting him to the clinic. Garcia claimed that correctional officers failed to protect him and provide medical care, violated his First Amendment right to free speech, and caused him mental anguish.

The defendants’ counsel asked the court to require Garcia to provide signed medical releases, warn him that the action could be dismissed for failure to prosecute, and require him to indicate that he intended to continue litigating by January 14, 2022. Counsel stated that three medical-release forms had been sent to Garcia and had not been returned. Counsel also stated that Garcia had been released on his own recognizance on December 7, 2021, had not updated his address on the court’s docket, and had not communicated with the court or defense counsel since his last address change.

Ruling

Judge Barbara C. Moses granted the application in part. The order required Garcia, no later than February 8, 2022, to provide defendants with executed copies of the medical releases served on September 13, October 6, and November 30, 2021. If Garcia had misplaced them, the order stated that he was responsible for contacting Assistant Corporation Counsel Mary K. Sherwood and arranging to obtain new copies. The order also reminded Garcia that failure to prosecute the action could lead to dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. The text provided does not state a separate disposition for each part of the defendants’ request.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.