D'Arrigo Bros Co. of New York, Inc. v. Jefe Produce LLC
- John Cronan
- 1:22-cv-00119
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 5
In D’Arrigo Bros. v. Jefe Produce, Judge Cronan granted a preliminary injunction protecting $291,771.50 in produce-sale trust funds.
The order directly affected Jefe Produce LLC, doing business as Garden Farm, Jeung S. Lee, and the specified people, entities, customers, and banking institutions connected to Jefe Produce. It protected the interests asserted by D’Arrigo Bros. Co. of New York, Inc., Fierman Produce Exchange, Inc., and Coosemans New York Inc.
What happened
In D’Arrigo Bros. Co. of New York, Inc. v. Jefe Produce LLC, three produce sellers said the defendants had not paid $291,771.50 for wholesale produce. They also said the defendants’ funds were at risk of being spent or transferred.
The court found that the sellers had preserved their interests in a trust created by the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act, a federal law protecting produce sellers. It also found that the defendants had accepted the produce, had not fully paid, and appeared to lack sufficient funds.
Judge John Cronan granted the preliminary injunction. The order barred the defendants and others from transferring or dissipating the company’s assets, required delivery of qualifying funds up to $291,771.50 to the plaintiffs’ lawyers, required financial disclosures, and authorized the plaintiffs’ lawyers to collect outstanding accounts receivable.
The detailed version
- D'Arrigo Bros Co. of New York, Inc. v. Jefe Produce LLC · No. 1:22-cv-00119
- John Cronan
- Jan. 18, 2022
Background
D’Arrigo Bros. Co. of New York, Inc., Fierman Produce Exchange, Inc., and Coosemans New York Inc. sued Jefe Produce LLC, doing business as Garden Farm, and Jeung S. Lee. The plaintiffs alleged that they sold the defendants wholesale produce worth $291,771.50 and were not paid.
The court found that the produce had moved in interstate commerce or was sold with that movement contemplated, and that the parties were covered by the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act (PACA). The court also found that the defendants accepted the produce without protest, did not make full payment despite repeated demands, and that the plaintiffs preserved their interests in the PACA trust by sending invoices containing the language required by federal law.
The court found that Lee told representatives of two plaintiffs that Jefe Produce lacked sufficient funds to pay its debts. The court also found that Lee said he was seeking money, including an Small Business Administration loan, and planned to sell Jefe Produce or property. Based on these facts, the court concluded that PACA trust assets in the defendants’ possession appeared to have been dissipated and remained at risk of dissipation.
Court’s analysis
Applying the standard for a preliminary injunction, the court found a likelihood that the plaintiffs would succeed on their claims, a likelihood of irreparable harm if relief were denied, a balance of hardships favoring the plaintiffs, and a public interest supporting protection of PACA trust assets. A preliminary injunction is a temporary court order issued before final resolution of the case.
Order
Judge John Cronan granted the plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction. The order barred the defendants, their customers, agents, employees, officers, directors, subsidiaries, related companies, successors, assigns, and banking institutions from transferring, spending, paying over, or otherwise dissipating Jefe Produce’s assets until further order of the court or until the defendants delivered $291,771.50 to the plaintiffs’ counsel.
The defendants were required to provide specified financial and accounts-receivable records within five business days. The defendants and their banking institutions were ordered, within two business days after service, to deliver PACA trust assets held for the defendants, up to $291,771.50, to the plaintiffs’ counsel pending further court order. The order also covered funds held by third parties, authorized the plaintiffs’ lawyers to collect Jefe Produce’s outstanding accounts receivable, and required the defendants to preserve their books and records and cooperate with those collection efforts.
Read the full 5-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.