Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 18, 2022

Swinson v. The City of New York

Judge
Katherine Failla
Docket
1:19-cv-11919
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureMotion to Dismiss
In one sentence

In Swinson v. The City of New York, Judge Failla dismissed the federal claims with prejudice, declined state-law jurisdiction, and denied appeal fee-waiver status.

Who this affects

Randy Swinson’s federal claims were dismissed with prejudice; his intended state-law claims were not addressed because the court declined jurisdiction, and the case was closed. The defendants obtained dismissal of the federal claims.

What happened

Swinson v. The City of New York concerns Randy Swinson’s claims against the City of New York and three individual defendants. The judgment refers to federal claims and state-law claims that Swinson intended to bring in a third amended complaint.

The court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the federal claims with prejudice. It declined to exercise jurisdiction over the intended state-law claims, closed the case, and denied fee-waiver status for any appeal after finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

Judge Katherine Failla’s Opinion and Order dated January 14, 2022 supplied the reasons for the judgment entered on January 18, 2022.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Swinson v. The City of New York · No. 1:19-cv-11919
Judge
Katherine Failla
Date
Jan. 18, 2022

Disposition

The judgment states that, for the reasons given in the court’s Opinion and Order dated January 14, 2022, the court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the federal claims with prejudice. The provided judgment does not explain the grounds for dismissing those claims.

The court declined to exercise jurisdiction over any state-law claims that Randy Swinson intended to bring in the third amended complaint. The case was therefore closed.

Appeal-related ruling

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Opinion and Order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied permission to appeal without paying filing fees.

Parties

The plaintiff is Randy Swinson. The defendants are The City of New York, Sherma Dunbar, Assistant Deputy Warden Elyn Rivera, and Captain John Hernandez.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.