Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 19, 2022

Jeanty v. Blue Rhino

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:21-cv-08326
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureMotion to Dismiss
In one sentence

In Jeanty v. Blue Rhino, Judge Swain dismissed the complaint after Jeanty failed to file an amended complaint as ordered.

Who this affects

Kervin Jeanty's complaint was dismissed, any state-law claims he may have asserted were not heard, and fee-free status was denied for an appeal.

What happened

In Jeanty v. Blue Rhino, the court had ordered Kervin Jeanty to file an amended complaint within 60 days and later extended that deadline.

Jeanty did not file an amended complaint. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain dismissed the complaint under the federal statute governing screening of complaints filed without paying court fees. The court declined to hear any state-law claims and denied fee-free status for an appeal, certifying that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Jeanty v. Blue Rhino · No. 1:21-cv-08326
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Jan. 19, 2022

Background

On October 18, 2021, the court ordered Kervin Jeanty to file an amended complaint within 60 days and stated that failing to do so would result in dismissal. The court later extended the filing deadline. Jeanty did not file an amended complaint.

Ruling

The court dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). The complaint had been filed without paying the filing fee under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). The opinion does not describe the claims or explain the underlying facts beyond the failure to file the required amended complaint.

The court declined under 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3) to exercise supplemental jurisdiction, meaning authority to hear related state-law claims, over any state-law claims Jeanty might have been asserting.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal. The clerk was directed to mail Jeanty a copy of the order and record service on the docket.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.