Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 20, 2022

Huang v. Gold House Restaurant Inc

Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Docket
1:21-cv-07067
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Huang v. Gold House Restaurant, Judge Abrams discontinued the case after reported agreement on all issues, allowing restoration within 30 days.

Who this affects

Ai Min Huang and defendants Gold House Restaurant Inc., Lai Kam Lam, and Yi Bao Zheng; the case was closed, subject to a possible application to restore it within 30 days.

What happened

Huang v. Gold House Restaurant Inc. involved Ai Min Huang’s claims against Gold House Restaurant Inc., Lai Kam Lam, and Yi Bao Zheng. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims.

The mediator’s office reported that an agreement had been reached on all issues in the case. The court did not state the agreement’s terms or decide the underlying claims.

Judge Ronnie Abrams ordered the action discontinued without fees or costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring it to the court’s docket if an application was made within 30 days. The Clerk of Court was directed to close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Huang v. Gold House Restaurant Inc · No. 1:21-cv-07067
Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Date
Jan. 20, 2022

Background

The case was brought by Ai Min Huang against Gold House Restaurant Inc., doing business as Huntspoint Chinese Restaurant, and Lai Kam Lam and Yi Bao Zheng. The opinion does not identify the claims or provide facts about the underlying dispute.

Reported Agreement

The mediator’s office reported to the court that an agreement had been reached on all issues. The opinion does not state the terms of that agreement.

Disposition

The court ordered that the action be discontinued without fees or costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s docket if an application to restore it was made within 30 days. It stated that an application to reopen filed after that period might be denied solely because it was late. The court also stated that, if the parties wanted the court to retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the agreement’s terms had to be placed on the public record and approved by the court within the same 30-day period. The Clerk of Court was directed to close the case. Judge Ronnie Abrams signed the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.