Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 20, 2022

Pinknews Media Group LTD. v. Here Publishing Inc.

Judge
Analisa Torres
Docket
1:19-cv-05609-AT-DCF
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Fee PetitionCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Pinknews Media Group v. Here Publishing, Judge Torres adopted the report and recommendation and denied Plaintiffs’ motion for attorneys’ fees.

Who this affects

Pinknews Media Group LTD. and the other plaintiffs were affected because their motion for attorneys’ fees was denied. The opinion does not state any further effect on the parties.

What happened

In Pinknews Media Group LTD. v. Here Publishing Inc., the court considered a report and recommendation from Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman concerning Plaintiffs’ motion for attorneys’ fees.

No party objected to the report and recommendation. District Judge Analisa Torres reviewed it for clear error and found none.

Judge Torres adopted the report and recommendation in full and denied Plaintiffs’ motion for attorneys’ fees. The Clerk of Court was directed to terminate the pending motion.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Pinknews Media Group LTD. v. Here Publishing Inc. · No. 1:19-cv-05609-AT-DCF
Judge
Analisa Torres
Date
Jan. 20, 2022

Background

The opinion concerns Plaintiffs’ motion for attorneys’ fees. Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman issued a report and recommendation addressing that motion. The opinion does not provide the report and recommendation’s reasoning or the amount of fees requested.

Review

No party filed objections to the report and recommendation. District Judge Analisa Torres therefore reviewed it for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake, and found none.

Ruling

The court adopted the report and recommendation in its entirety. It denied Plaintiffs’ motion for attorneys’ fees and directed the Clerk of Court to terminate the motion pending at ECF No. 55.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.