Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 1, 2022

Mitchell v. City of Poughkeepsie School District

Judge
Louis Stanton
Docket
1:19-cv-03879-LLS
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Mitchell v. City of Poughkeepsie School District, Judge Stanton denied Mitchell’s request for a court-requested free lawyer because the case was closed.

Who this affects

Jasmine Mitchell, who brought the action on behalf of J.C.M. and was litigating without a lawyer, was affected by the denial of the application for court-requested pro bono counsel.

What happened

In Mitchell v. City of Poughkeepsie School District, Jasmine Mitchell brought the action without a lawyer on behalf of J.C.M. The court had dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim and entered judgment in 2019.

Mitchell later tried to appeal, but the district court denied her request for more time to appeal, and the Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal after she did not pay the fees or submit an application to proceed without paying them. In October 2021, she applied for the court to request free legal counsel.

Because the action was closed, the court denied Mitchell’s application as moot. Judge Louis L. Stanton also directed the Clerk of Court to mail her a copy of the order and record service on the docket.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Mitchell v. City of Poughkeepsie School District · No. 1:19-cv-03879-LLS
Judge
Louis Stanton
Date
Feb. 1, 2022

Background

Jasmine Mitchell brought the action without a lawyer on behalf of J.C.M. The court previously dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim on which relief could be granted, and judgment was entered on September 23, 2019.

Prior Appeal Proceedings

Mitchell later moved for more time to file a notice of appeal and asked to proceed without paying appellate filing fees. The district court denied the request for more time because it was filed more than 60 days after judgment and the court lacked authority to grant it. The court also denied the request to proceed without paying fees as moot. The Court of Appeals later dismissed the appeal because Mitchell did not pay the appeal fees or submit an application to proceed without paying them to that court.

Application for Counsel

More than two years after judgment, Mitchell applied for the court to request free legal counsel. The court stated that the action was closed and therefore denied the application as moot.

Disposition

The court denied Mitchell’s application for the court to request pro bono counsel. It directed the Clerk of Court to mail a copy of the order to Mitchell and note service on the docket.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.