Iraq Telecom Limited v. IBL Bank S.A.L.
- Denise Cote
- 1:21-cv-10940
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 4
In Iraq Telecom v. IBL Bank, Judge Cote granted Iraq Telecom’s renewed request to attach up to $100 million in IBL Bank property pending arbitration-award proceedings.
Iraq Telecom Limited received authority to secure up to $100 million through an immediate levy. IBL Bank S.A.L. faced attachment of property in the specified accounts. The listed garnishee banks were required to respond to the order, and Court Support, Inc. and its employees were authorized to serve and carry out the levy in place of the U.S. Marshal.
What happened
Iraq Telecom Limited v. IBL Bank S.A.L. concerns Iraq Telecom’s request to secure payment of a foreign arbitration award by temporarily restricting access to IBL’s property held in New York. Iraq Telecom asked the court to act without first notifying IBL, saying there was an immediate risk that IBL would move or spend its assets.
The court had previously denied Iraq Telecom’s first request without prejudice. After Iraq Telecom renewed its request and identified accounts at four banks, the court authorized a levy—meaning a legal hold—on IBL’s property in those accounts, up to $100 million. The order also required Iraq Telecom to post a $100,000 bond and directed that the petition and summons be served on IBL by international courier.
Judge Denise Cote granted Iraq Telecom’s renewed request for an immediate attachment under New York law and federal procedural rules. The order lists accounts at Citibank, JPMorgan Chase, and Bank of New York Mellon, and permits Court Support, Inc. and its employees to serve the order and carry out the levy in place of the U.S. Marshal.
The detailed version
- Iraq Telecom Limited v. IBL Bank S.A.L. · No. 1:21-cv-10940
- Denise Cote
- Jan. 27, 2022
Background
Iraq Telecom Limited filed a verified petition seeking confirmation of a foreign arbitration award and an ex parte order of attachment against IBL Bank S.A.L. An ex parte order is issued without advance notice to the opposing party. Iraq Telecom sought to attach IBL’s money, accounts, property, or property interests up to $100 million while the arbitration-award proceedings were pending.
The court denied Iraq Telecom’s first request on December 22, 2021, without prejudice. The court stated that the first request did not identify deposits owned by IBL in New York and currently held by a New York bank, and did not address relevant Second Circuit precedent. Iraq Telecom later filed a renewed motion and a supplemental declaration. The court then required Iraq Telecom to identify the specific funds it sought to attach by listing the account numbers and banks.
Court’s Findings
The court found that Iraq Telecom had shown an immediate risk that IBL, described in the order as a foreign corporation and non-domiciliary, would remove or dissipate assets if it received notice of the attachment request. The court also found that the requirements for attachment under New York Civil Practice Law and Rules § 6201(1) and § 7502 were satisfied. The order states that IBL was a foreign corporation not qualified to do business in New York, that attachment was needed to secure payment of an arbitration award, and that without attachment the award could become ineffective. The court further found that Iraq Telecom had identified IBL accounts in New York and that applicable case law did not bar attachment of the property held by the listed banks.
Order
The court granted Iraq Telecom’s renewed motion for an ex parte order of attachment. The attachment became effective immediately and was to remain effective unless the court later amended or vacated it. The amount secured was $100 million.
Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 64 and New York Civil Practice Law and Rules Articles 62 and 75, the order authorized the U.S. Marshal, or an appointed substitute, to levy on IBL’s property within the Southern District of New York without taking possession of it. The listed garnishee banks and accounts were:
- Citibank, account number 36329262 - JPMorgan Chase, account number 291853882 - Bank of New York Mellon, account number 803 3215 046 - Bank of New York Mellon, account number 803 3036 168
The order appointed Court Support, Inc. and its employees to serve the attachment order and carry out the levy in place of the U.S. Marshal. It extended the period during which the levy would remain valid until 30 days after the court, or the parties by agreement, resolved any motion to confirm or vacate the attachment order or any levy served under it. The garnishee banks were required to provide a statement required by New York law within ten days after service. Iraq Telecom was required to post a $100,000 bond within 14 days, and service of the summons and petition on IBL was ordered by international courier.
Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.