Genovese v. United States
- Jesse Furman
- 1:22-cv-00800
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Genovese v. United States, Judge Furman ordered a government response to Genovese’s post-conviction motion after finding it should not be summarily dismissed.
Nicholas Joseph Genovese and the United States, through the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York; the order required the government to respond and allowed Genovese to reply.
What happened
In Genovese v. United States, Nicholas Joseph Genovese filed a motion under federal law seeking relief from his criminal case. The court concluded that the motion should not be summarily dismissed as lacking merit.
The court ordered the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York to file an answer or other response by April 7, 2022. It directed the response to address whether the motion was filed on time and whether Genovese had waived the right to challenge his sentence after the criminal case ended.
Genovese could file a response by May 9, 2022, after which the motion would be considered ready for decision unless the court ordered otherwise. Judge Jesse M. Furman did not decide the motion’s merits in this order.
The detailed version
- Genovese v. United States · No. 1:22-cv-00800
- Jesse Furman
- Feb. 3, 2022
What the order concerns
Nicholas Joseph Genovese filed a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, a procedure allowing a federal prisoner to seek relief from a federal sentence or conviction. The court stated that the motion should not be summarily dismissed as without merit.
What the court ordered
The court directed the Clerk of Court to notify the Criminal Division of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York. The U.S. Attorney’s Office had to file an answer or other pleadings responding to the motion by April 7, 2022.
The court specifically directed the government’s response to address, among other issues:
- whether the motion was timely; and - whether Genovese waived the right to bring a later challenge to his sentence.
Genovese was permitted to file a response by May 9, 2022. Unless the court issued another order, the motion would be considered fully submitted on that date. The court also directed that future filings include the criminal docket number and be docketed only in the criminal case, and directed the Clerk to mail Genovese a copy of the order.
Result and significance
The order required the government to respond; it did not grant or deny Genovese’s § 2255 motion and did not decide whether the motion was timely or barred by a waiver. Judge Jesse M. Furman’s order therefore addressed the next procedural step rather than the merits of Genovese’s claims.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.