Sandoz Inc. v. Medwiz Solutions, LLC
- Nelson Roman
- 7:20-cv-06943
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 4
In Sandoz v. Medwiz, Judge Roman granted Sandoz’s request to keep its RICO claim dismissed without prejudice while discovery proceeds.
Sandoz Inc. and the defendants, because the RICO claim remained dismissed without prejudice while the case proceeded into discovery, subject to a future deadline for amended pleadings.
What happened
In Sandoz Inc. v. Medwiz Solutions, LLC, the court had dismissed Sandoz’s Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act claim without prejudice and allowed Sandoz to amend its complaint by March 4, 2022. The earlier order warned that the claim could become dismissed with prejudice if Sandoz did not amend without good cause.
Sandoz told the court it did not plan to amend its complaint at that time, but asked that the claim remain dismissed without prejudice while the parties entered discovery. The defendants did not respond to the request.
Judge Nelson S. Roman granted Sandoz’s request. The court directed the parties to file a case-management plan by February 21, 2022, and said the plan must include an agreed deadline for amended pleadings, by which Sandoz could seek to replead the RICO claim after discovery began.
The detailed version
- Sandoz Inc. v. Medwiz Solutions, LLC · No. 7:20-cv-06943
- Nelson Roman
- Feb. 4, 2022
Background
The court stated that, on January 12, 2022, it had granted in part and denied in part the defendants’ motion to dismiss Sandoz’s complaint. In that earlier ruling, the court dismissed Sandoz’s RICO claim without prejudice and allowed Sandoz to file an amended complaint by March 4, 2022. The court had also stated that, if Sandoz did not amend within the permitted time and lacked good cause, the RICO claim would be treated as dismissed with prejudice.
Sandoz informed the court that it did not intend to file an amended complaint at that time. It asked the court to continue treating the RICO claim as dismissed without prejudice while the case moved into discovery. The defendants did not respond to Sandoz’s request.
Court’s Analysis
The court explained that whether a plaintiff has good cause to amend a complaint is within the court’s discretion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. The court cited decisions allowing amendments after discovery revealed facts relevant to a claim. It therefore granted Sandoz’s request to keep the RICO claim dismissed without prejudice as the parties proceeded into discovery.
Disposition
The court granted Sandoz’s request. Because Sandoz said it would not amend its pleading at that time, the court directed the parties to complete and file a case-management plan and scheduling order by February 21, 2022. The court noted that the parties were required to agree on a deadline for amended pleadings in that order. If Sandoz later sought to replead the RICO claim after discovery began, it could do so by the agreed deadline.
Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.