Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 4, 2022

Sandoz Inc. v. Medwiz Solutions, LLC

Judge
Nelson Roman
Docket
7:20-cv-06943
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedureDiscovery
In one sentence

In Sandoz v. Medwiz, Judge Roman granted Sandoz’s request to keep its RICO claim dismissed without prejudice while discovery proceeds.

Who this affects

Sandoz Inc. and the defendants, because the RICO claim remained dismissed without prejudice while the case proceeded into discovery, subject to a future deadline for amended pleadings.

What happened

In Sandoz Inc. v. Medwiz Solutions, LLC, the court had dismissed Sandoz’s Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act claim without prejudice and allowed Sandoz to amend its complaint by March 4, 2022. The earlier order warned that the claim could become dismissed with prejudice if Sandoz did not amend without good cause.

Sandoz told the court it did not plan to amend its complaint at that time, but asked that the claim remain dismissed without prejudice while the parties entered discovery. The defendants did not respond to the request.

Judge Nelson S. Roman granted Sandoz’s request. The court directed the parties to file a case-management plan by February 21, 2022, and said the plan must include an agreed deadline for amended pleadings, by which Sandoz could seek to replead the RICO claim after discovery began.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Sandoz Inc. v. Medwiz Solutions, LLC · No. 7:20-cv-06943
Judge
Nelson Roman
Date
Feb. 4, 2022

Background

The court stated that, on January 12, 2022, it had granted in part and denied in part the defendants’ motion to dismiss Sandoz’s complaint. In that earlier ruling, the court dismissed Sandoz’s RICO claim without prejudice and allowed Sandoz to file an amended complaint by March 4, 2022. The court had also stated that, if Sandoz did not amend within the permitted time and lacked good cause, the RICO claim would be treated as dismissed with prejudice.

Sandoz informed the court that it did not intend to file an amended complaint at that time. It asked the court to continue treating the RICO claim as dismissed without prejudice while the case moved into discovery. The defendants did not respond to Sandoz’s request.

Court’s Analysis

The court explained that whether a plaintiff has good cause to amend a complaint is within the court’s discretion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. The court cited decisions allowing amendments after discovery revealed facts relevant to a claim. It therefore granted Sandoz’s request to keep the RICO claim dismissed without prejudice as the parties proceeded into discovery.

Disposition

The court granted Sandoz’s request. Because Sandoz said it would not amend its pleading at that time, the court directed the parties to complete and file a case-management plan and scheduling order by February 21, 2022. The court noted that the parties were required to agree on a deadline for amended pleadings in that order. If Sandoz later sought to replead the RICO claim after discovery began, it could do so by the agreed deadline.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.