Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 14, 2022

Neumentum, Inc. v. Ancoris Capital Partners LLC

Judge
Andrew Carter
Docket
1:21-cv-09838
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
10
DiscoveryCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Neumentum v. Ancoris, Judge Netburn approved a protective order governing confidential discovery information, its use, challenges, court filings, and return or destruction.

Who this affects

Neumentum, Inc., Ancoris Capital Partners LLC, appropriate nonparties producing or receiving information, their counsel and staff, experts and consultants, deposition and trial witnesses, and court personnel are affected by the order’s confidentiality and discovery procedures.

What happened

Neumentum, Inc. v. Ancoris Capital Partners LLC is an order approving the parties’ agreement about handling confidential information exchanged during discovery. The order does not decide the parties’ underlying claims.

The order allows either party or an appropriate nonparty to label documents or testimony confidential when disclosure could harm a business or its customers or clients. It limits disclosure and use of that information, sets procedures for experts and witnesses, and establishes a process for challenging confidentiality designations.

The order also sets procedures for filing confidential material with the court, including requests to seal or redact, and requires confidential materials generally to be returned or destroyed within 60 days after the litigation ends. Judge Netburn ordered the stipulated protective order on February 14, 2022.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Neumentum, Inc. v. Ancoris Capital Partners LLC · No. 1:21-cv-09838
Judge
Andrew Carter
Date
Feb. 14, 2022

Nature of the Order

The court entered a stipulated protective order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c). The order governs the production, exchange, use, and protection of confidential or proprietary information during discovery. The parties’ attorneys stipulated to the order, and the document ends with “SO ORDERED.”

Confidentiality Designations

A party or appropriate nonparty may designate documents or testimony as confidential by marking documents, making a statement during a deposition, giving written notice, or using another appropriate method. “Confidential Information” includes material containing trade secrets, proprietary business information, competitively sensitive information, or other information whose disclosure the designating party or nonparty believes in good faith could harm its business or the business of its customers or clients.

A receiving party may challenge a confidentiality designation. If the producing party does not agree to remove the designation within seven days after written notice, the receiving party may ask the court to remove it. Until the court rules, the material remains confidential. The producing party bears the burden of showing that the designation is proper.

Limits on Disclosure and Use

Unless the producing party consents in writing or the court orders otherwise, confidential information may be disclosed only to specified people, including relevant personnel, litigation counsel and support staff, qualified experts or consultants, the court and its personnel, deposition officers, and certain witnesses. Experts and consultants must first receive the order and sign a written agreement to follow it. Confidential information may be used only for this litigation.

Depositions are presumptively confidential during the deposition and for 30 days after counsel receives the transcript. Documents or testimony produced by nonparties may also be designated confidential under procedures and deadlines stated in the order. People who receive confidential information must not disclose it to unauthorized people and must use reasonable measures to prevent unauthorized disclosure.

Court Filings and Later Handling

A party intending to file material containing confidential information must notify the other parties seven days before filing. A party seeking redaction or sealing must follow the court’s individual rules and provide a particularized justification. Material may be filed temporarily under seal while a sealing request is pending. If the request is granted in whole or in part, or denied, the parties must file the affected documents as required within three business days.

The order does not determine whether any material is admissible or privileged, and producing confidential information does not waive objections to producing other information. The parties may seek changes to the order or challenge confidentiality designations through a properly noticed motion.

Within 60 days after the litigation ends through settlement or completion of appeals, confidential information and reproductions generally must be returned or destroyed, subject to specified retention of litigation files by counsel. The order remains binding after the litigation ends, subject to its provisions concerning court exhibits, sealed or redacted materials, and later court orders.

Disposition and Effect

Judge Netburn entered the stipulated protective order on February 14, 2022. Because the order addresses discovery management and confidentiality rather than the merits of the underlying dispute, this is a procedural order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 10-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.