Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 15, 2022

Woitovich v. Schoenfeld

Judge
Jesse Furman
Docket
1:22-cv-01196
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Woitovich v. Schoenfeld, Judge Furman ordered citizenship allegations amended or warned of dismissal for lack of jurisdiction.

Who this affects

Rhonda Woitovich, Lydia Schoenfeld, and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC; the order required additional citizenship allegations before the case could proceed on the asserted diversity jurisdiction.

What happened

In Woitovich v. Schoenfeld, Rhonda Woitovich sued Lydia Schoenfeld and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC, relying on diversity jurisdiction. The complaint alleged residences for the individuals and identified the LLC’s organization and principal business locations.

The court said those allegations were insufficient. For an LLC, the complaint must identify the citizenship of every member, and for individuals it must state citizenship rather than residence.

Judge Jesse M. Furman ordered Woitovich to amend the complaint by March 7, 2022. The court stated that the complaint would be dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction if she could not truthfully allege complete diversity.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Woitovich v. Schoenfeld · No. 1:22-cv-01196
Judge
Jesse Furman
Date
Feb. 15, 2022

Background

Rhonda Woitovich brought the action against Lydia Schoenfeld and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC, invoking federal jurisdiction based on diversity of citizenship under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The complaint alleged that Woitovich was a resident of New Jersey. It alleged that Schoenfeld was a resident, but did not state her citizenship. It described Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC, as organized under Delaware law and headquartered in New York County, New York.

Court’s analysis

The court explained that a limited liability company is a citizen of every state where its members are citizens. A complaint relying on diversity jurisdiction therefore must identify the citizenship of each person or entity that makes up the LLC, including the citizenship of members that are themselves LLCs. The complaint did not provide that information. The court also said that alleging residence, rather than citizenship, was insufficient for Woitovich and Schoenfeld.

Order and effect

The court ordered Woitovich to amend the complaint by March 7, 2022, to allege the citizenship of every constituent person or entity of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC, as well as the citizenship of the individual parties. The court stated that, if she could not truthfully allege complete diversity by that date, the complaint would be dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction without further notice. The order addressed the adequacy of the jurisdictional allegations and did not decide the underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.