Artists Rights Society, Inc. v. La Ligne, LLC
- Vernon Broderick
- 1:21-cv-09498
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Artists Rights Society v. La Ligne, Judge Broderick ordered a showing of good cause before possible dismissal for failure to serve.
Artists Rights Society, Inc. must explain its failure to serve La Ligne LLC within the required period or face possible dismissal of the action.
What happened
Artists Rights Society, Inc. sued La Ligne LLC on November 16, 2021, and obtained a summons the next day. The opinion says Artists Rights Society had not filed proof of service or taken other action to move the case forward.
The court ordered Artists Rights Society to file, by March 4, 2022, a letter of no more than three pages explaining why the case should not be dismissed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). The letter had to show good cause for not serving La Ligne within 90 days after the complaint was filed.
The order did not dismiss the case. It warned that failing to file the letter and show good cause would result in dismissal. Judge Vernon S. Broderick explained that good cause generally requires exceptional circumstances beyond the plaintiff's control and that attorney carelessness or neglect ordinarily is not enough.
The detailed version
- Artists Rights Society, Inc. v. La Ligne, LLC · No. 1:21-cv-09498
- Vernon Broderick
- Feb. 18, 2022
Background
Artists Rights Society, Inc. filed the action against La Ligne LLC on November 16, 2021. Artists Rights Society obtained a summons on November 17, 2021. The court stated that, as of the date of the order, Artists Rights Society had not filed an affidavit of service or taken any other action to prosecute the case.
Court’s action
The court ordered Artists Rights Society to submit a letter of no more than three pages by March 4, 2022. The letter had to be supported by legal authority and demonstrate good cause—an adequate legal reason—for why the case should not be dismissed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). That rule concerns the time limit for serving a defendant with the summons and complaint.
The court stated that good cause generally exists only in exceptional circumstances in which the failure to serve process on time resulted from circumstances beyond the plaintiff’s control. It also identified the plaintiff’s diligence in attempting service and any prejudice to the defendant from the delay as relevant considerations. The court stated that an attorney’s inadvertence, neglect, mistake, or misplaced reliance does not constitute good cause.
Disposition
The court did not dismiss the action in this order. Instead, it required Artists Rights Society to explain why dismissal should not occur and warned that failure to submit the letter and demonstrate good cause for not serving La Ligne within 90 days after the complaint was filed would result in dismissal. The order was signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.