Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 22, 2022

Latouche v. Dr. John Hammer

Judge
Cathy Seibel
Docket
7:22-cv-01437
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Latouche v. Rockland County, Judge Swain ordered Latouche to pay fees or submit forms to proceed without prepaying, or the action will be dismissed.

Who this affects

Valery Latouche, the incarcerated plaintiff proceeding without a lawyer, must either pay the required fees or submit the specified forms within 30 days to continue the action.

What happened

In Valery Latouche v. Rockland County, et al., Valery Latouche filed a civil action without paying the required fees or submitting completed forms to request permission to proceed without prepaying them. The opinion says Latouche was incarcerated and represented himself.

The court ordered Latouche, within 30 days, either to pay $402 in fees or submit a completed application and prisoner authorization. The authorization would allow filing-fee payments to be deducted from his prison account in installments. No summons would issue at that time, and the action would be dismissed if Latouche did not comply.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain issued the order on February 22, 2022. The court also stated that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Latouche v. Dr. John Hammer · No. 7:22-cv-01437
Judge
Cathy Seibel
Date
Feb. 22, 2022

Background

Valery Latouche, who the opinion says was incarcerated at Sing Sing Correctional Facility and was proceeding without a lawyer, filed a civil action against Rockland County and other defendants. Latouche submitted the complaint without paying the required fees and without submitting a completed application to proceed without prepaying fees or a prisoner authorization.

Fee requirement

The court explained that a prisoner starting a civil action must either pay $402—the $350 filing fee and $52 administrative fee—or submit an application requesting permission to proceed without prepaying fees, together with a prisoner authorization. If that request is granted, the filing fee is collected in installments from the prisoner’s account. The administrative fee does not apply to a person granted that status.

Order

The court ordered Latouche to do one of the following within 30 days of the order: pay the $402 in fees, or submit the completed application and prisoner authorization using docket number 22-CV-1437 (LTS). No summons would issue at that time. The order states that, if Latouche failed to comply within the allowed period, the action would be dismissed. The court did not decide the underlying claims.

Appeal and other directions

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The Clerk of Court was directed to mail the order to Latouche and record service on the docket. The order also cautioned that a later dismissal for frivolousness, maliciousness, or failure to state a claim could count as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.