Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 23, 2022

Hedges v. Genexa Inc.

Judge
Vyskocil
Docket
1:22-cv-00510
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Hedges v. Genexa Inc., Judge Vyskocil discontinued the action after a settlement in principle, allowing restoration by April 6, 2022, if needed.

Who this affects

Donna Hedges and Genexa Inc.; the action was discontinued subject to the stated deadline for seeking restoration.

What happened

In Hedges v. Genexa Inc., Donna Hedges informed the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.

The court discontinued the action without costs to either party and allowed it to be restored if the parties could not put their settlement in writing, provided any request to restore was made by April 6, 2022. If no request was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil entered the order of dismissal. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement’s terms.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Hedges v. Genexa Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-00510
Judge
Vyskocil
Date
Feb. 23, 2022

Background

Donna Hedges filed a letter informing the court that she and Genexa Inc. had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not identify the claims or provide the terms of the proposed settlement.

Ruling

The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party. The order permitted either party to seek restoration of the action to the court’s calendar if the parties were unable to memorialize, or put, their settlement in writing. Any application to restore the action had to be made by April 6, 2022.

The order states that if no application to restore the action was made by that date, the dismissal of the action would be with prejudice. Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil signed the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.