Wager v. G4S Secure Integration, LLC
- Vyskocil
- 1:19-cv-03547
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Wager v. G4S Secure Integration, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the action after a settlement in principle, subject to restoration by March 23, 2022.
The parties to Wager v. G4S Secure Integration, LLC: Ashly Wager and G4S Secure Integration, LLC.
What happened
Wager v. G4S Secure Integration, LLC involved a letter from G4S informing the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.
The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement’s terms. The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to either party and allowed either party to seek restoration if the settlement could not be put in writing.
Judge Vyskocil ordered that any application to restore the action be made by March 23, 2022. If no application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
The detailed version
- Wager v. G4S Secure Integration, LLC · No. 1:19-cv-03547
- Vyskocil
- Feb. 23, 2022
Background
The court received a letter filed by G4S Secure Integration, LLC stating that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not provide the underlying claims or the terms of the proposed settlement.
Ruling
The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar if the parties were unable to memorialize their settlement in writing. Any application to restore the action had to be made by March 23, 2022. The court further ordered that if no application was made by that date, the dismissal of the action would be with prejudice.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.