Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 23, 2022

Lamarre v. Rockland County Office for the Aging

Judge
Cathy Seibel
Docket
7:22-cv-01406
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Lamarre v. Rockland County Office for the Aging, Judge Seibel ordered the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendant and extended the service deadline.

Who this affects

Reine M. Lamarre and Rockland County Office for the Aging; the order directs the Clerk of Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendant.

What happened

In Lamarre v. Rockland County Office for the Aging, Reine M. Lamarre brought a case without a lawyer under the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Rehabilitation Act, the Family and Medical Leave Act, and possibly New York’s Human Rights Law. The court had already allowed her to proceed without paying filing fees.

Because Lamarre was allowed to proceed without paying filing fees, the court said she could rely on the U.S. Marshals Service to deliver the summons and complaint. The court extended the service deadline to 90 days after the summons is issued, rather than 90 days after the complaint was filed.

Judge Seibel ordered the Clerk of Court to issue the summons, complete the required service form, and give the necessary documents to the U.S. Marshals Service for service on Rockland County Office for the Aging. The order did not decide the merits of Lamarre’s claims. Lamarre was also directed to notify the court in writing if her address changes.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Lamarre v. Rockland County Office for the Aging · No. 7:22-cv-01406
Judge
Cathy Seibel
Date
Feb. 23, 2022

Background

Reine M. Lamarre filed this action without a lawyer. She asserted claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993. The court also said the complaint could be read broadly as asserting claims under the New York State Human Rights Law. In an order dated February 23, 2022, the court granted Lamarre permission to proceed without paying filing fees.

Service of process

Because Lamarre was allowed to proceed without paying filing fees, federal law required the court to direct the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendant. The court explained that Lamarre could not have served the summons and complaint before the court reviewed the complaint and ordered that a summons be issued.

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) generally requires service within 90 days after the complaint is filed. The court extended that period here to 90 days after the summons is issued. The court stated that if service is not completed within that period, Lamarre should ask for an extension of time.

Order

The court instructed the Clerk of Court to issue a summons for Rockland County Office for the Aging, complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form with the defendant’s address, and give the Marshals Service all documents needed to complete service. The Clerk was also directed to mail Lamarre a copy of the order and an information package.

The order further required Lamarre to notify the court in writing if her address changes and stated that the court may dismiss the action if she fails to do so. Judge Cathy Seibel’s order addressed service and case administration; it did not decide whether Lamarre’s statutory claims were valid.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.