Tavarez-Vargas v. Culture Carton LLC
- John Cronan
- 1:21-cv-09876
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Tavarez-Vargas v. Culture Carton, Judge Cronan ordered more briefing before deciding Plaintiff’s default-judgment motion, questioning whether the website is an ADA public accommodation.
Carmen Tavarez-Vargas and Culture Carton LLC; the order directs Plaintiff to provide more briefing and service before the court considers the default-judgment motion.
What happened
In Tavarez-Vargas v. Culture Carton LLC, Plaintiff alleged that Defendant’s website was inaccessible to blind and visually impaired users and violated federal and New York City disability laws. Defendant did not appear or answer the Complaint.
Plaintiff moved for default judgment after Defendant missed the response deadline. The court did not decide that motion in this order.
Judge John P. Cronan ordered Plaintiff to submit additional briefing on whether Defendant’s website is a “place of public accommodation” under the Americans with Disabilities Act. He also ordered Plaintiff to serve the order and briefing on Defendant and file proof of service.
The detailed version
- Tavarez-Vargas v. Culture Carton LLC · No. 1:21-cv-09876
- John Cronan
- Feb. 24, 2022
Background
Carmen Tavarez-Vargas filed the Complaint on November 23, 2021. The Complaint alleges that she is visually impaired and legally blind and that Culture Carton LLC’s website denied her equal enjoyment of goods or services because the website was not designed, maintained, or operated to be fully accessible to, and independently usable by, blind or visually impaired people who use screen-reading software.
The Complaint asserts claims under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, the New York City Human Rights Law, and for declaratory relief. Culture Carton was served on January 12, 2022, but did not appear or answer by the February 2, 2022 deadline.
Motion and Court’s Order
After the court directed Plaintiff to move for default judgment, Plaintiff filed that motion and supporting papers on February 23, 2022. The court did not grant or deny the motion in this order.
Instead, the court ordered Plaintiff to file supplemental briefing by March 3, 2022, on whether Culture Carton’s website qualifies as a “place of public accommodation” under the ADA. The court identified this issue as potentially affecting whether the Complaint adequately alleges an ADA claim and cited decisions addressing whether websites are places of public accommodation when the businesses lack public-facing physical retail operations.
The court also ordered Plaintiff to serve Culture Carton by overnight courier with a copy of the order and to file proof of service by February 28, 2022. Plaintiff was required to serve the supplemental briefing and file proof of that service by March 7, 2022.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.