Henry v. The City of New York
- John Koeltl
- 1:17-cv-03450
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Henry v. City of New York, Judge Aaron approved defendants’ proposed redactions to previously filed documents and exhibits.
The defendants’ proposed redactions were approved, affecting the redacted and unredacted versions of the specified docket documents and exhibits.
What happened
In Henry v. The City of New York, the defendants asked the court to approve redactions to documents and exhibits that had previously been filed electronically.
The court reviewed the proposed redactions and the corresponding redacted and unredacted versions of the documents. The opinion does not describe the specific information redacted.
Judge Stewart D. Aaron approved the proposed redactions, finding them consistent with controlling Second Circuit authority. The order did not address the underlying claims in the case.
The detailed version
- Henry v. The City of New York · No. 1:17-cv-03450
- John Koeltl
- Feb. 24, 2022
Background
The defendants submitted a letter and proposed redactions to documents and exhibits previously filed on the court’s electronic docket. The court reviewed the redacted and unredacted versions of the listed filings.
Ruling
The court approved the proposed redactions. It found that they were consistent with controlling authority from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, citing Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). The order did not decide the parties’ underlying claims or defenses.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.