A. v. New York City Department of Education
- Paul Engelmayer
- 1:20-cv-10785
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 29
A. v. New York City Department of Education: Judge Engelmayer awarded reduced IDEA fees and costs but denied declaratory relief about administrative delay.
H.A. and M.A. received an award of $22,866.73 in reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs, while the New York City Department of Education was ordered to pay the award. The ruling also denied H.A.’s request for a declaration concerning the Department’s handling of the administrative proceeding.
What happened
In A. v. New York City Department of Education, H.A. sought attorneys’ fees, costs, and interest after an administrative hearing ordered the Department to fund independent evaluations and related transportation and services for M.A., a child with a disability. H.A. also asked for a declaration that the Department had unreasonably delayed the administrative case.
The court found that H.A. was the prevailing party because she obtained the requested relief. It reduced the requested hourly rates and billed hours, disallowed or reduced certain costs, denied pre-judgment interest, and awarded post-judgment interest as required. The total award was $22,866.73 in attorneys’ fees and costs.
Judge Engelmayer granted the motion for fees and costs in an amount below what H.A. requested and denied the motion for declaratory relief. He also directed the Clerk to close the motion and the case.
The detailed version
- A. v. New York City Department of Education · No. 1:20-cv-10785
- Paul Engelmayer
- Feb. 25, 2022
Background
H.A. brought an action under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, a federal law concerning special-education rights, after an administrative hearing before an independent hearing officer ordered the New York City Department of Education to provide independent evaluations and related relief for M.A., a child with a disability. H.A. sought reimbursement for attorneys’ work and costs incurred both in the administrative proceeding and in the federal fee action. She requested $47,094.05, including interest, and also sought a declaration that the Department had unreasonably prolonged resolution of the administrative proceeding.
In the administrative proceeding, H.A. requested independent neuropsychological, occupational-therapy, and speech-therapy evaluations; transportation payments; and an individualized education program meeting after the evaluations. The hearing officer ordered the Department to fund the evaluations, pay transportation expenses, and hold the meeting within three weeks after receiving the evaluations. The Department did not contest liability but objected to parts of the requested relief.
Prevailing-Party Status
The court held that H.A. was the prevailing party. The administrative order materially changed the parties’ legal relationship and granted H.A. significant relief on the merits of her claims. Under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, a prevailing parent may receive reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs for work performed in the administrative proceeding and the related federal litigation.
Hourly Rates
The court used the lodestar method, which calculates fees by multiplying a reasonable hourly rate by a reasonable number of hours. It found the following rates reasonable:
- Andrew Cuddy and Michael Cuddy: $375 per hour. - Benjamin Kopp: $250 per hour. - Justin Coretti: $275 per hour, although he performed only limited work. - Sarah Woodard: $125 per hour for administrative-proceeding work. - Shobna Cuddy, Cailin O’Donnell, Amanda Pinchak, Emma Bianco, and Burhan Meghezzi: $100 per hour.
The court rejected the higher rates requested by H.A. because the case was straightforward, largely uncontested, and involved short administrative proceedings. The court also found that the evidence did not support higher rates for several paralegals.
Hours and Costs
The firm billed 54.7 hours for the administrative proceeding and 68.5 hours for the federal fee litigation. The court found excessive or unreasonable billing in both phases. Examples included nearly nine hours preparing for a 17-minute hearing, 7.2 hours preparing a short post-hearing brief, numerous separate entries billed in 0.10-hour increments for minor tasks, six hours drafting the federal complaint, and eight hours preparing a lengthy declaration defending individual billing entries.
The court applied an across-the-board 20% reduction to the compensable hours for both the administrative proceeding and the federal fee litigation. It also reduced or disallowed certain costs. The court deducted $128.64 for lodging, reduced printing costs from $0.50 per page to $0.10 per page, and deducted $18.38 for meals. It allowed the explained fax costs and postage costs.
Interest and Declaratory Relief
The court declined to award pre-judgment interest because H.A. had not shown that such an award was necessary and had not identified an IDEA case in the Circuit awarding it in similar circumstances. The court awarded post-judgment interest, which it stated was required on civil judgments from the date judgment is entered.
The court denied H.A.’s request for a declaration that the Department unreasonably prolonged the administrative proceeding. Although the Department had sometimes been unresponsive, the court found that the record did not establish unreasonable prolongation. The court also concluded that the requested declaration would not change the fee calculation because the fee request still had to be limited to reasonable work.
Disposition
Judge Engelmayer granted the motion for attorneys’ fees and costs in a reduced amount and denied the motion for declaratory relief. The court awarded H.A. a total of $22,866.73 in reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs and directed the Clerk of Court to close the motion and the case.
Read the full 29-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.