Stewart v. Eastchester Professional Firefighters Local 916
- Vincent Briccetti
- 7:22-cv-00378
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Stewart v. Eastchester Professional Firefighters Local 916, Judge Briccetti vacated a prior order and set deadlines for amendment or proceeding on the complaint.
Kevin Stewart, Eastchester Professional Firefighters Local 916, and The Eastchester Fire District were affected by the deadlines and filing options in the order. The court’s order did not resolve the defendants’ motions to dismiss.
What happened
In Stewart v. Eastchester Professional Firefighters Local 916, Eastchester Fire District and Eastchester Professional Firefighters Local 916 had each asked the court to dismiss Kevin Stewart’s complaint. The opinion does not decide those requests.
The court vacated its March 2, 2022 order and required Stewart to notify the court by March 14 whether he would file an amended complaint or rely on the existing complaint. If he chose to amend, he had 14 days after notifying the court to file the amended complaint.
The court stated that the defendants could answer, move to dismiss the amended complaint, or rely on their original motions within 21 days after the amendment. Judge Briccetti also set the ordinary briefing rules for the motions if Stewart chose not to amend.
The detailed version
- Stewart v. Eastchester Professional Firefighters Local 916 · No. 7:22-cv-00378
- Vincent Briccetti
- Mar. 3, 2022
Background
The court’s order concerned two motions to dismiss filed on March 1, 2022. Eastchester Fire District and Eastchester Professional Firefighters Local 916 each moved under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), which allows a defendant to argue that a complaint does not adequately state a legal claim. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or decide whether the complaint was legally sufficient.
What the Court Ordered
The court vacated its March 2, 2022 order. It ordered Kevin Stewart to notify the court by March 14, 2022, whether he intended to file an amended complaint in response to the motions or would rely on the complaint already being challenged.
If Stewart chose not to amend, the motions to dismiss would proceed under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the court’s local rules. The court stated that it was unlikely to give Stewart another opportunity to amend later to address deficiencies made apparent by the fully briefed motions.
If Stewart chose to amend, he had to file the amended complaint within 14 days after notifying the court. Within 21 days after the amendment, each defendant could file an answer, move to dismiss the amended complaint, or notify the court that it would rely on its initially filed motion to dismiss.
Disposition and Significance
The court did not grant or deny either motion to dismiss. Instead, it vacated the prior order and established the plaintiff’s choices and the parties’ deadlines while the motions remained pending. Judge Vincent L. Briccetti signed the order on March 3, 2022, in White Plains, New York.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.