Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 4, 2022

Gonzalez v. Healthy Market Place Corp.

Judge
Lorna Schofield
Docket
1:21-cv-03317
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureFee Petition
In one sentence

In Gonzalez v. Healthy Market Place Corp., Judge Schofield approved the settlement and granted counsel $5,433.30.

Who this affects

Javier Gonzalez, Healthy Market Place Corp. and the other defendants, and Plaintiff’s counsel.

What happened

In Gonzalez v. Healthy Market Place Corp., the parties asked the court to approve their settlement agreement as fair and reasonable.

The court reviewed the agreement, the reasons supporting approval, counsel’s time records, and the breakdown of counsel’s fees. The opinion does not identify the specific claims or the settlement’s total amount.

Judge Schofield approved the settlement, granted counsel’s request for $5,433.30, directed that the rest of the settlement go to Javier Gonzalez, and directed the clerk to close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Gonzalez v. Healthy Market Place Corp. · No. 1:21-cv-03317
Judge
Lorna Schofield
Date
Mar. 4, 2022

Background

On March 3, 2022, the parties filed a settlement agreement and a joint letter explaining why they believed the court should approve it as fair and reasonable. The agreement included payment of attorneys’ fees. The court reviewed counsel’s contemporaneous time records and the breakdown of counsel’s fees.

Rulings

The court approved the settlement agreement as fair and reasonable. It based that decision on the nature and scope of Javier Gonzalez’s claims and the risks and expenses involved in continuing the litigation.

The court granted Plaintiff’s counsel’s request for $5,433.30. The opinion states that this amount included costs and a settlement payment to Plaintiff’s counsel, was below the lodestar amount, and was approximately one-third of the settlement. A lodestar is the reasonable hourly rate multiplied by the reasonable number of hours required for the case. The court found the requested amount fair and reasonable in light of counsel’s quality, the risks of litigation, and the litigation’s magnitude and complexity.

Disposition

The court directed that the remainder of the settlement be distributed to Javier Gonzalez and directed the Clerk of Court to close the case. The opinion does not state the underlying claims or the total settlement amount.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.