Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 4, 2022

Rodriguez v. Taco Mix LLC

Judge
Edgardo Ramos
Docket
1:21-cv-03644
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Rodriguez v. Taco Mix LLC, Judge Ramos directed the parties to submit their all-issues settlement for review by March 18, 2022.

Who this affects

The plaintiff and all named defendants were directed to submit their settlement for court review.

What happened

In Rodriguez v. Taco Mix LLC, the court received a mediator’s report stating that mediation had occurred and the parties had reached an agreement on all issues.

The opinion does not describe the claims, the settlement’s terms, or the parties’ positions. It directs the parties to submit their settlement for court review under the cited Second Circuit decision Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., by March 18, 2022.

Judge Edgardo Ramos ordered the submission but did not approve or reject the settlement in this opinion.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Rodriguez v. Taco Mix LLC · No. 1:21-cv-03644
Judge
Edgardo Ramos
Date
Mar. 4, 2022

Background

The court received a mediator’s report stating that mediation had been held and that the parties had reached an agreement on all issues. The case names Maximinio Rodriguez as the plaintiff and Taco Mix LLC, Taco Mix It LLC, Taco Mix NI LLC, Taco Mix Brooklyn LLC, Taco Mix Staten Island LLC, Jorge Sanchez, Alejo Sanchez, and Joanna Sanchez as defendants.

Order

The court directed the parties to submit their settlement for review under Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., 796 F.3d 199 (2d Cir. 2015), by March 18, 2022. The opinion does not state the settlement’s terms or make a final decision approving or rejecting it.

Disposition

The court ordered the settlement submission. Judge Edgardo Ramos did not decide the underlying claims in this order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.