Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.OtherFiled Mar. 8, 2022

Koestler v. Shkreli

Judge
Denise Cote
Docket
1:16-cv-07175
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Koestler v. Shkreli, a filing addressed to Judge Cote requests permission to submit a letter motion under seal; no court ruling is provided.

Who this affects

The parties and the public-access interests implicated by the requested sealing of the filing.

What happened

In Koestler v. Shkreli, a filing asks the Southern District of New York for permission to submit a letter motion under seal. The filing says the motion concerns confidential information.

The filing identifies the information as terms of an operating agreement and current offers to purchase Phoenixus AG stock. It also acknowledges that sealing or redacting court papers must be narrowly tailored and consistent with public access to judicial documents.

The provided text does not show whether the request was granted or denied. Judge Denise Cote is identified as the judge, but no ruling appears in the text.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Koestler v. Shkreli · No. 1:16-cv-07175
Judge
Denise Cote
Date
Mar. 8, 2022

Nature of the Filing

The provided text is a letter dated March 7, 2022, addressed to Judge Denise L. Cote. It asks for permission to file a letter motion under seal under the judge's Individual Rule 8(B), which concerns sealing or redacting court filings.

Information the Filing Seeks to Protect

The filing says the proposed letter motion contains confidential information about the terms of an operating agreement and current offers to purchase Phoenixus AG stock.

Legal Standard Cited

The filing states that any sealing or redaction must be narrowly tailored to serve the purpose supporting it and must be consistent with the presumption that judicial documents should be publicly accessible. It cites Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 119–20 (2d Cir. 2006), and asserts that the operating-agreement details and stock-purchase offers satisfy that standard.

What the Provided Text Does Not Establish

The text is a request, not a court order. It does not state whether Judge Denise Cote granted or denied permission to file the letter motion under seal. It also does not provide a ruling on the underlying dispute.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.