Leal Florez v. Goldlyn LLC
- Katherine Failla
- 1:20-cv-05243
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Leal Florez v. Goldlyn LLC, Judge Failla granted the parties’ request for more time to submit their settlement agreement and directed termination of motion 51.
The parties and their attorneys received additional time to submit the settlement agreement; the Clerk of Court was directed to terminate motion 51.
What happened
In Leal Florez v. Goldlyn LLC, the plaintiffs asked for a two-week extension to submit a settlement agreement for court approval. The request said the parties had agreed on a final form but still needed to review it with the individual parties and obtain signatures.
The defendants consented to the extension. The existing deadline was March 11, 2022.
Judge Failla granted the application and directed the Clerk of Court to terminate the motion at docket entry 51. The order did not approve the settlement or decide the underlying claims.
The detailed version
- Leal Florez v. Goldlyn LLC · No. 1:20-cv-05243
- Katherine Failla
- Mar. 11, 2022
Background
The plaintiffs, through their attorney, asked the court for a two-week extension to submit their settlement agreement for court approval. The request stated that the parties had agreed on a final form of the agreement but needed additional time to review it with the individual parties and obtain their signatures. The defendants consented to the request. The deadline for submitting the agreement was March 11, 2022.
Ruling
Judge Katherine Polk Failla granted the application. She directed the Clerk of Court to terminate the motion at docket entry 51.
Effect of the Order
The opinion does not state that the court approved the settlement agreement, and it does not decide the underlying claims. It grants additional time for submitting the agreement and closes the referenced motion on the docket.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.