Rodriguez v. Manzi
- Judith McCarthy
- 7:21-cv-07438
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 3
Rodriguez v. Manzi: Judge McCarthy approved a wage-settlement agreement resolving claims under federal and New York wage laws and closed the case.
The ruling directly affected Israel Rodriguez and the defendants, 6 South Broadway Corp. doing business as River City Grille and Robert Manzi. The opinion describes Rodriguez’s action as brought on behalf of others similarly situated, but it does not state that a class was certified.
What happened
In Rodriguez v. Manzi, Israel Rodriguez brought a proposed class action against 6 South Broadway Corp. doing business as River City Grille and Robert Manzi. He sought unpaid minimum and overtime wages, additional pay required for long workdays, and other damages under federal and New York wage laws.
The parties attended three court-ordered mediation sessions and reached a settlement before extensive discovery. They submitted the settlement agreement, a supporting letter, and records concerning attorney fees and costs for the court’s review.
Judge Judith C. McCarthy found that the agreement resulted from arms-length negotiations between capable lawyers and was a fair and reasonable resolution. The court approved the settlement, including the requested attorney fees, and asked the Clerk to close the case.
The detailed version
- Rodriguez v. Manzi · No. 7:21-cv-07438
- Judith McCarthy
- Mar. 11, 2022
Background
Israel Rodriguez brought a proposed class action individually and on behalf of others similarly situated against 6 South Broadway Corp. doing business as River City Grille and Robert Manzi. He sought unpaid minimum and overtime wages, spread-of-hours premiums, and liquidated and statutory damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 and following, and the New York Labor Law.
The parties participated in court-ordered mediation on December 21, 2021, January 11, 2022, and January 19, 2022. They reached a settlement and submitted a Settlement Agreement and Release of Claims for court review, along with a joint supporting letter and records documenting attorney time and costs. The parties also consented to the magistrate judge’s jurisdiction over the case for all purposes.
Court’s Analysis
The court applied the standard that an FLSA settlement must be a fair and reasonable compromise of disputed issues rather than an employer’s improper waiver of statutory rights. The court considered the parties’ early mediation, their three meetings with the mediator, and their effort to resolve the case before extensive discovery. It also reviewed the settlement agreement, the supporting letter, and the documentation concerning attorney fees and costs.
Ruling
Judge Judith C. McCarthy found that the settlement resulted from arms-length negotiations between capable counsel. The court concluded that the agreement’s terms, including approval of the plaintiff’s attorney fees, were a fair and reasonable resolution of the case. Accordingly, the court approved the settlement and respectfully requested that the Clerk close the case.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.