Curcio v. Grossman
- Vincent Briccetti
- 7:22-cv-01648
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Curcio v. Grossman, Judge Briccetti’s court dismissed the action and denied fee-free appeal status under the stated certification.
The judgment dismissed Rosanna Curcio’s action against County of Putnam Judge Victor Grossman, Donna E. Abrams, Laura Roberts, and County of Putnam, and denied permission to appeal without paying court fees.
What happened
Rosanna Curcio sued County of Putnam Judge Victor Grossman, Donna E. Abrams, Laura Roberts, and the County of Putnam. The judgment states that the court dismissed the action for the reasons given in a March 14, 2022 order, which is not included in the provided text.
The judgment also states that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied Curcio permission to appeal without paying court fees. The judgment does not state whether the dismissal was with or without prejudice.
In Curcio v. Grossman, Judge Vincent Briccetti’s court entered judgment dismissing the case on March 14, 2022. The provided judgment does not explain the legal basis for the dismissal.
The detailed version
- Curcio v. Grossman · No. 7:22-cv-01648
- Vincent Briccetti
- Mar. 14, 2022
Disposition
The court entered judgment dismissing the action. The judgment says this occurred for the reasons stated in the court’s order dated March 14, 2022, but that order is not included in the provided opinion text. Accordingly, the reason for dismissal and whether the court addressed the merits cannot be determined from this text.
Appeal-fee ruling
The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. Based on that certification, it denied permission to appeal without paying court fees. The judgment does not state that the dismissal was with prejudice or without prejudice.
Parties and effect
The caption identifies Rosanna Curcio as the plaintiff and County of Putnam Judge Victor Grossman, Donna E. Abrams, Laura Roberts, and County of Putnam as the defendants. The judgment terminated the action in the district court. The provided text does not describe the claims, the parties’ arguments, or the basis for the dismissal.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.