Contreras v. Karizma Lounge Corp.
- Edgardo Ramos
- 1:20-cv-05167
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Contreras v. Karizma Lounge, Judge Ramos adjourned deadlines and conferences while the parties submitted their settlement for court review.
The parties in Contreras v. Karizma Lounge Corp.; the order postpones their deadlines and conferences and requires them to submit their settlement for court review.
What happened
In Contreras v. Karizma Lounge Corp., the parties told the court that they had reached a settlement in principle and asked to postpone upcoming deadlines and a conference.
The court directed the parties to submit their settlement for review by March 30, 2022. The court also adjourned all deadlines and conferences.
Judge Edgardo Ramos entered the order requiring the settlement submission and review. The opinion does not say that the court approved the settlement.
The detailed version
- Contreras v. Karizma Lounge Corp. · No. 1:20-cv-05167
- Edgardo Ramos
- Mar. 16, 2022
Background The plaintiff’s counsel informed the court on March 15, 2022, that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. The parties asked the court to postpone all deadlines and the conference scheduled for the following day.
Court’s action The court adjourned all deadlines and conferences. It directed the parties to submit their settlement to the court by March 30, 2022, for review under Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., 796 F.3d 199 (2d Cir. 2015).
Result The order postponed the case deadlines and conferences and required submission of the settlement for review. The opinion does not state that the court approved the settlement or describe the claims underlying the case.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.