Estevez v. Pocketwatch, Inc.
- Vyskocil
- 1:21-cv-09009
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Estevez v. Pocketwatch, Inc., Judge Vyskocil discontinued the action after a settlement in principle, subject to restoration by April 15, 2022.
Arturo Estevez, Pocketwatch, Inc., and the people described in the caption as "all others similarly situated."
What happened
In Estevez v. Pocketwatch, Inc., Arturo Estevez told the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.
The court discontinued the action without costs to either party and without prejudice to restoring it if the parties could not put their settlement in writing. Any request to restore the case had to be made by April 15, 2022.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil stated that if no restoration request was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
The detailed version
- Estevez v. Pocketwatch, Inc. · No. 1:21-cv-09009
- Vyskocil
- Mar. 15, 2022
Background
Arturo Estevez brought the action individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated against Pocketwatch, Inc. The court received a letter from Estevez stating that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.
Ruling
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar if the parties were unable to memorialize their settlement in writing. The court required any application to restore the action to be made by April 15, 2022. The order states that if no such application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.