Dalmau v. 1084 NY Ave LLC
- Barbara Moses
- 1:21-cv-04407
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Dalmau v. 1084 NY Ave LLC, Judge Moses approved a $20,000 settlement and dismissed the action against Liberty Place with prejudice and without costs.
Juan Mejia Dalmau and Liberty Place Property Management LLC were affected by the approved settlement and dismissal. The action continued against the other defendants identified in the opinion.
What happened
In Dalmau v. 1084 NY Ave LLC, Juan Mejia Dalmau and Liberty Place Property Management LLC asked the court to approve their settlement of claims under federal and New York wage laws. The settlement covered only Liberty Place, one of several defendants, while Dalmau’s claims against other defendants remained pending.
Liberty Place agreed to pay Dalmau $20,000. The court found the amount fair despite being much less than Dalmau’s estimated maximum recovery because the parties disputed whether he was exempt from overtime, how many hours he worked, and whether a 2016 release barred part of his claims. Dalmau’s attorneys also waived their fee, and the agreement contained a limited release without confidentiality, rehiring, or non-disparagement terms.
Judge Barbara Moses approved the settlement as fair and reasonable. She ordered that the action be dismissed as to Liberty Place only, with prejudice and without costs.
The detailed version
- Dalmau v. 1084 NY Ave LLC · No. 1:21-cv-04407
- Barbara Moses
- Mar. 17, 2022
Background
The court reviewed the parties’ joint request to approve a fully executed settlement agreement under the requirement that certain wage-and-hour settlements receive judicial review. The agreement settled Juan Mejia Dalmau’s claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act and the New York Labor Law against Liberty Place Property Management LLC. Liberty Place managed the building where Dalmau worked until January 2018. Liberty Place was only one of the defendants in the action, and claims against other defendants, including the successor management company, remained pending.
The parties reached the settlement after arm’s-length bargaining at a judicially supervised settlement conference before Judge Moses on December 1, 2021. The parties later consented to Judge Moses’s jurisdiction for purposes of approving the settlement.
Settlement Terms and Court’s Analysis
Liberty Place agreed to pay Dalmau a lump sum of $20,000. The parties acknowledged that this amount was substantially less than Dalmau’s counsel’s estimate of a possible maximum recovery of up to $280,000. The court nevertheless found the payment fair and reasonable because Dalmau faced several litigation risks, including:
- Liberty Place’s non-frivolous argument that Dalmau was entirely exempt from overtime under New York law as a residential-building “janitor”; - sharp factual disputes about the hours Dalmau actually worked; and - a 2016 release that, if enforceable, would bar recovery for approximately one-third of the period covered by Dalmau’s New York Labor Law claims against Liberty Place.
Dalmau’s attorneys waived their fee, so Dalmau would receive the entire $20,000 settlement. The agreement also included a limited release covering claims concerning or related to minimum-wage and overtime pay and related matters. It did not include a confidentiality clause, rehiring prohibition, or non-disparagement requirement.
Disposition
The court found that the financial and non-financial terms satisfied the applicable fairness requirement and approved the proposed settlement. The court dismissed this action as to Liberty Place Property Management LLC only, with prejudice and without costs. The opinion states that claims against other defendants remained pending.
Classification
This is a procedural order because the court approved a settlement and dismissed the claims against one defendant without deciding the underlying wage-and-hour merits.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.