Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 21, 2022

Global Export Marketing Co., Ltd. v. Abdelrahman A. Abbar Trading Company

Judge
Alison Nathan
Docket
1:20-cv-03504
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Global Export Marketing v. Abbar Trading, Judge Nathan ordered Plaintiff to file a default-judgment motion and warned of possible dismissal for failure to prosecute.

Who this affects

Global Export Marketing Co., Ltd. was ordered to file a motion for default judgment by April 1, 2022. Abdelrahman A. Abbar Trading Company was the defendant against which Plaintiff intended to seek default judgment.

What happened

Global Export Marketing Co., Ltd. told the court on January 18, 2022, that it intended to seek a default judgment against Abdelrahman A. Abbar Trading Company. The clerk later entered a certificate of default on March 1, 2022.

The court ordered Plaintiff to file its motion for default judgment by April 1, 2022. The order did not decide whether Plaintiff was entitled to a default judgment.

Judge Alison J. Nathan warned that failing to act could result in dismissal of the claims for failure to prosecute. The order was dated March 21, 2022.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Global Export Marketing Co., Ltd. v. Abdelrahman A. Abbar Trading Company · No. 1:20-cv-03504
Judge
Alison Nathan
Date
Mar. 21, 2022

Background

Global Export Marketing Co., Ltd. notified the court on January 18, 2022, of its intent to move for default judgment. The clerk issued a certificate of default on March 1, 2022. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or explain the basis for the default.

Order

The court ordered Plaintiff to file a motion for default judgment by April 1, 2022. This order set a filing deadline; it did not grant or deny default judgment and did not decide the underlying claims.

Warning and disposition

Judge Alison J. Nathan warned that failure to act could result in dismissal of the claims for failure to prosecute. The order itself did not dismiss the claims. It cited the court's authority to dismiss an action when a plaintiff fails to prosecute it.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.