Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 22, 2022

Weekes v. Paper Mart, Inc.

Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Docket
1:21-cv-10582
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureClass Action
In one sentence

In Robert Weekes v. Frick Paper Company LLC, Judge Abrams discontinued the settled case without costs, while allowing restoration within 30 days.

Who this affects

Robert Weekes, the people he sought to represent, and Frick Paper Company LLC.

What happened

Robert Weekes v. Frick Paper Company LLC was reported to have settled. Weekes brought the case individually and on behalf of others similarly situated.

The court discontinued the action without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring it to the court’s docket within 30 days. The court also directed the Clerk of Court to close the case.

Judge Ronnie Abrams said any request to reopen the case must be filed within 30 days. The order did not describe the settlement’s terms or decide the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Weekes v. Paper Mart, Inc. · No. 1:21-cv-10582
Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Date
Mar. 22, 2022

Background

Robert Weekes sued Frick Paper Company LLC individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated. The opinion states that the court was informed that the case had settled, but it does not provide the settlement terms or explain whether any class was certified.

Ruling

The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s docket if an application to restore it was made within 30 days. It further stated that any application to reopen the action had to be filed within 30 days of the order and that a later application could be denied solely because it was late.

The court added that, if the parties wanted it to retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the agreement’s terms had to be placed on the public record and approved by the court within the same 30-day period. The Clerk of Court was directed to close the case. The order did not resolve the merits of the claims.

Effect

The case was closed based on the reported settlement, subject to the stated 30-day procedure for seeking restoration or reopening. The opinion does not state what relief, if any, the settlement provided.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.