Arroyo v. John/Jane Does 1-4
- Laura Swain
- 1:21-cv-10823
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Arroyo v. John/Jane Does 1-4, Judge Swain dismissed Arroyo’s complaint without prejudice and denied fee relief and appeal filing-fee status.
Annibal Arroyo’s case was dismissed without prejudice. He remains responsible for the full $350 filing fee, and the court denied filing-fee status for an appeal. The unnamed defendants were not required to litigate the underlying claims in this order.
What happened
In Arroyo v. John/Jane Does 1-4, Annibal Arroyo brought claims under a federal civil-rights law based on events in 2018 and 2019 while he was a pretrial detainee. The court had directed him to file an amended complaint.
Arroyo later asked in letters to withdraw his complaint. He also asked for a refund of the filing fee and questioned withdrawals from his account. The court said he had not shown a basis for a refund or other relief.
Judge Laura Taylor Swain dismissed the complaint without prejudice under Rule 41(a), which allows a plaintiff to voluntarily withdraw a case. The court also denied filing-fee status for any appeal, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.
The detailed version
- Arroyo v. John/Jane Does 1-4 · No. 1:21-cv-10823
- Laura Swain
- Mar. 24, 2022
Background
Annibal Arroyo filed claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 concerning events in 2018 and 2019, when he was a pretrial detainee at the Anna M. Kross Center. The court had directed him to file an amended complaint within 60 days. In letters dated February 19 and 22, 2022, Arroyo asked to voluntarily withdraw the complaint.
Filing-fee requests
The complaint had been filed without prepaying the filing fee under the statute allowing qualifying litigants to proceed without prepayment. Arroyo asked for the filing fee to be refunded and appeared to question whether withdrawals from his account exceeded the required installments. The court explained that a prisoner who receives this status must still pay the full filing fee, even if the case is later voluntarily withdrawn or dismissed. The court also explained that payments toward filing fees for multiple cases may be withdrawn at the same time. Because the court did not have copies of Arroyo’s prison account statements, it could not determine whether the withdrawals complied with the statute. The court noted that Arroyo had not alleged withdrawals exceeding the $350 filing fee and had not established a basis for relief.
Ruling
Judge Laura Taylor Swain dismissed the complaint without prejudice under Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The court also certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied filing-fee status for the purpose of an appeal. The order did not resolve the underlying § 1983 claims.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.