Northeast Remsco Construction v. Cablevision Systems New York City Corporation
Northeast Remsco Construction, Inc. v. Cablevision Systems New York City Corporation
- Ronnie Abrams
- 1:22-cv-00765
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Northeast Remsco Construction v. Cablevision Systems, Judge Abrams discontinued the case after a reported settlement, allowing restoration within 45 days.
Northeast Remsco Construction, Inc. and Cablevision Systems New York City Corp.
What happened
Northeast Remsco Construction, Inc. v. Cablevision Systems New York City Corp. involved a reported settlement in principle between the parties.
The court discontinued the action without costs to either party and without prejudice to restoring it to the court’s docket if an application was made within 45 days. The opinion does not state the settlement’s terms.
Judge Ronnie Abrams directed that the case be closed. Any request for the court to keep authority to enforce the settlement had to place the agreement’s terms on the public record and receive the court’s approval within the same 45-day period.
The detailed version
- Northeast Remsco Construction v. Cablevision Systems New York City Corporation · No. 1:22-cv-00765
- Ronnie Abrams
- Mar. 25, 2022
Background
The court stated that the parties had reported reaching a settlement in principle. The opinion does not describe the underlying dispute or provide the settlement’s terms.
Court’s Action
The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to either party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s docket. An application to restore or reopen the action had to be filed within 45 days of the order; an application filed later could be denied solely because it was late.
The court also stated that, if the parties wanted it to retain authority to enforce a settlement agreement, the agreement’s terms had to be placed on the public record and approved by the court within that same 45-day period. Judge Ronnie Abrams directed the Clerk of Court to close the case.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.