Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 28, 2022

Friar v. Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc.

Judge
James Oetken
Docket
1:20-cv-02627
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
ContractCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Friar v. Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Judge Oetken granted Wyndham default judgment and dismissed Friar’s claims for failure to prosecute.

Who this affects

Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc. obtained default judgment and monetary awards against Isiam Ray Friar; Friar’s claims against the defendants were dismissed for failure to prosecute.

What happened

In Friar v. Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc., Isiam Ray Friar sued Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Derrick Taylor, and Maria Maese over two timeshare contracts, alleging fraud and recession. Wyndham responded with a breach-of-contract counterclaim after Friar stopped making payments.

Friar did not defend against the counterclaim, so the court entered default judgment for Wyndham. Wyndham received $29,227.24 for one contract and $29,200.09 for the other, plus nine-percent prejudgment interest from the dates specified in the order until March 28, 2022.

Judge James Oetken also dismissed Friar’s claims against the defendants for failure to prosecute and directed the Clerk to enter judgment and close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Friar v. Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc. · No. 1:20-cv-02627
Judge
James Oetken
Date
Mar. 28, 2022

Background

Isiam Ray Friar sued Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc., Derrick Taylor, and Maria Maese, asserting state-law claims of fraud and recession. Wyndham filed a breach-of-contract counterclaim against Friar and moved for default judgment.

Friar purchased a timeshare from Wyndham in 2014 under two contracts. Contract 1401168 provided 250,000 annual points and required monthly payments of $579.50. Contract 1402430 provided 750,000 annual points and required monthly payments of $581.39. Friar stopped making payments in February 2017. At that time, he allegedly owed $29,227.24 on Contract 1401168 and $29,200.09 on Contract 1402430.

Wyndham filed its counterclaim and served Friar on April 9, 2021. After Friar failed to plead or otherwise defend, the Clerk issued a certificate of default, and Wyndham moved for default judgment.

Court’s Analysis

The court held that it had subject-matter jurisdiction based on complete diversity. It also determined that Wyndham’s breach-of-contract counterclaim was compulsory because it arose from the same transaction as Friar’s claims.

For a default judgment, the court accepts the well-pleaded factual allegations of the non-defaulting party as true but must still determine whether those allegations establish liability as a matter of law. The court concluded that Wyndham’s well-pleaded counterclaim established Friar’s liability and that Wyndham was entitled to the requested relief.

Ruling

The court granted Wyndham’s motion for default judgment. It awarded Wyndham judgment against Friar in the amount of $29,227.24 for Contract 1401168, plus prejudgment interest at New York’s statutory rate of nine percent from April 25, 2019, through March 28, 2022. It awarded Wyndham $29,200.09 for Contract 1402430, plus nine-percent prejudgment interest from April 30, 2019, through March 28, 2022.

The court also dismissed Friar’s claims against the defendants for failure to prosecute. It directed the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly, close the motion, and close the case. Wyndham was directed to mail Friar a copy of the order within seven days.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.