IN RE MEXICAN GOVERNMENT BONDS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
- James Oetken
- 1:18-cv-02830
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In In re Mexican Government Bonds Antitrust Litigation, Judge Oetken consolidated five related cases under 18-CV-2830 and directed the Clerk to close the other dockets.
The plaintiffs and defendants in the six related actions are affected by the consolidation and filing instructions. The order also directs the Clerk of Court to close the five member-case dockets for administrative purposes, while stating that the parties’ rights are not affected.
What happened
In In re Mexican Government Bonds Antitrust Litigation, plaintiffs brought related antitrust lawsuits against financial institutions involved in the market for Mexican government bonds. The complaints alleged that the defendants were the exclusive Mexican government-approved market makers for those bonds and violated Section 1 of the Sherman Act.
The court consolidated five related actions under lead case number 18-CV-2830 and ordered that filings in the member cases be made in the lead case. The court explained that the consolidated cases keep their separate identities and directed the Clerk to close the other five cases for administrative purposes.
Judge J. Paul Oetken stated that the consolidation order does not affect the parties’ rights in any of the consolidated cases. The order did not decide the antitrust claims.
The detailed version
- IN RE MEXICAN GOVERNMENT BONDS ANTITRUST LITIGATION · No. 1:18-cv-02830
- James Oetken
- Mar. 29, 2022
Background
On March 30, 2018, Oklahoma Firefighters Pension & Retirement System and Electrical Workers Pension Fund Local 103, I.B.E.W. filed a class action complaint against numerous financial institutions and John Does 1-10. The complaint alleged that the defendants were the “exclusive Mexican government-approved market makers” for Mexican government bonds and asserted a claim under Section 1 of the Sherman Act, which prohibits certain agreements restraining trade.
Other plaintiffs later filed similar actions in the Southern District of New York. Five of those actions were assigned or reassigned to Judge J. Paul Oetken.
Court’s Action
The court ordered the five related actions consolidated under lead case number 18-CV-2830. It directed that all filings in the member cases be made in the lead case. The court emphasized that, despite consolidation, the cases retain their separate identities.
For administrative purposes, the Clerk of Court was directed to close the other five actions. The court stated that this order does not affect the rights of the parties in any of the consolidated cases.
Disposition and Classification
The court entered an administrative consolidation order. It did not rule on the merits of the antitrust claims. This is a procedural order because it addressed case management rather than deciding whether the alleged conduct violated antitrust law.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.
Related cases
- IN RE MEXICAN GOVERNMENT BONDS ANTITRUST LITIGATIONAug 2022
- IN RE MEXICAN GOVERNMENT BONDS ANTITRUST LITIGATIONAug 2022
- IN RE MEXICAN GOVERNMENT BONDS ANTITRUST LITIGATIONMar 2022
- IN RE MEXICAN GOVERNMENT BONDS ANTITRUST LITIGATIONNov 2020
- In Re: MYLAN N.V. SECURITIES LITIGATIONApr 2020
- In re Extended Stay Hotel Antitrust LitigationSep 2026