Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 31, 2022

White v. New York City Police Department

Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Docket
1:19-cv-07945
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

Judge Engelmayer adopted a recommendation to dismiss White v. New York City Police Department for failure to prosecute and ordered the case closed.

Who this affects

Devin White, the self-represented plaintiff, was affected by the adopted recommendation to dismiss the case for failure to prosecute. The New York City Police Department and the other respondents were also affected by the case’s closure.

What happened

In White v. New York City Police Department, Devin White, who represented himself, filed a complaint in 2019. The court repeatedly instructed him to amend the complaint or respond to court orders, but he did not do so.

Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave recommended dismissing the case because White failed to prosecute it. No party objected to that recommendation, so the district court reviewed it for clear error—an obvious mistake on the record.

Judge Paul A. Engelmayer found no clear error, adopted Judge Cave’s recommendation in full, and directed the Clerk of Court to close the case and mail the decision to White.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
White v. New York City Police Department · No. 1:19-cv-07945
Judge
Paul Engelmayer
Date
Mar. 31, 2022

Background

Devin White filed the complaint on August 22, 2019, and represented himself. The district court referred the case to Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave. The opinion states that White was repeatedly instructed to amend his complaint and respond to the court’s orders, but he did not do so.

Report and Recommendation

On August 14, 2020, Judge Cave issued a report and recommendation advising that the case be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Failure to prosecute means not taking the steps needed to move a case forward. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or decide whether those claims had merit.

District Court’s Review and Ruling

Because no party objected to the report and recommendation, Judge Engelmayer reviewed it for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake apparent from the record. He found no facial error in Judge Cave’s conclusions and adopted the report and recommendation in its entirety. The Clerk of Court was directed to close the case and mail a copy of the decision to White at the address on file.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.