Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 4, 2022

Singh v. Beverley Hotels Associates, LLC

Judge
Andrew Carter
Docket
1:21-cv-08341
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
FlsaCivil Procedure
In one sentence

Singh v. Beverley Hotels, Judge Carter ordered the parties to submit their proposed FLSA settlement for judicial approval before dismissal.

Who this affects

Balbir Singh and the defendants in the FLSA case, whose proposed settlement must be submitted for judicial approval before dismissal.

What happened

In Singh v. Beverley Hotels Associates, LLC, the court said the parties had reached an agreement on all issues. The complaint includes a claim under the Fair Labor Standards Act, a federal wage-and-hour law.

The court required the parties to file their proposed settlement agreement and a memorandum explaining why the settlement is fair. The materials were due by May 2, 2022.

Judge Carter did not approve the settlement or dismiss the case in this order. He ordered the parties to submit the settlement materials for judicial approval before dismissal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Singh v. Beverley Hotels Associates, LLC · No. 1:21-cv-08341
Judge
Andrew Carter
Date
Apr. 4, 2022

Background The opinion states that Balbir Singh sued Beverley Hotels Associates, LLC, and other defendants. The complaint asserts a claim under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The court learned that the parties had reached an agreement on all issues.

Court’s action Because the case includes an FLSA claim, the court required the parties to file a proposed settlement agreement and a fairness memorandum before the case could be dismissed. The court directed the parties to submit those materials for judicial approval by May 2, 2022.

Result The order did not approve the settlement and did not dismiss the case. It required the parties to submit the settlement materials for review before dismissal.

Note on the caption The opinion text appears to spell the defendant’s name as “BEVERLEY HOTELS ASSOCIATES, LCC,” while the provided case metadata identifies the entity as “Beverley Hotels Associates, LLC.” This summary uses the provided case name.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.