CF2 Co., Ltd. v. YOCO Inc.
- Vyskocil
- 1:19-cv-07774
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In CF2 Co. v. YOCO, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the settled case without costs, subject to restoration by May 4, 2022.
CF2 Co., Ltd. and defendants YOCO Inc., M.A.X. Sports Enterprise Inc., Hun C. Park, KP Apparel Group, Inc., and Kelly S. Park were affected by the discontinuance and conditional dismissal of the case.
What happened
CF2 Co., Ltd. v. YOCO Inc. involved CF2 Co., Ltd. and several defendants. The court received a letter stating that all parties had reached a settlement in principle.
The court ordered the case discontinued without costs to any party. It allowed either side to ask to restore the case to the court’s calendar by May 4, 2022.
If no restoration request was made by that date, the court stated that the dismissal would be with prejudice. Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil also adjourned all other dates and deadlines indefinitely.
The detailed version
- CF2 Co., Ltd. v. YOCO Inc. · No. 1:19-cv-07774
- Vyskocil
- Apr. 4, 2022
Background
The opinion identifies CF2 Co., Ltd. as the plaintiff and YOCO Inc., M.A.X. Sports Enterprise Inc., Hun C. Park, KP Apparel Group, Inc., and Kelly S. Park as defendants. The court received a letter stating that all parties had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not describe the claims or the settlement’s terms.
Court’s action
The court ordered that the case be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring it to the court’s calendar if an application to restore was made by May 4, 2022. The court stated that if no such application was made by that date, the dismissal of the action would be with prejudice. “With prejudice” means the action could not be brought again. The court also adjourned all other dates and deadlines indefinitely.
Disposition
The court entered an order of dismissal based on the parties’ settlement in principle. The opinion does not decide the underlying claims. Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil signed the order on April 4, 2022.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.